Literature DB >> 27881721

Using noise to shape motor learning.

Elias B Thorp1,2, Konrad P Kording2,3,4, Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi5,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Each of our movements is selected from any number of alternative movements. Some studies have shown evidence that the central nervous system (CNS) chooses to make the specific movements that are least affected by motor noise. Previous results showing that the CNS has a natural tendency to minimize the effects of noise make the direct prediction that if the relationship between movements and noise were to change, the specific movements people learn to make would also change in a predictable manner. Indeed, this has been shown for well-practiced movements such as reaching. Here, we artificially manipulated the relationship between movements and visuomotor noise by adding noise to a motor task in a novel redundant geometry such that there arose a single control policy that minimized the noise. This allowed us to see whether, for a novel motor task, people could learn the specific control policy that minimized noise or would need to employ other compensation strategies to overcome the added noise. As predicted, subjects were able to learn movements that were biased toward the specific ones that minimized the noise, suggesting not only that the CNS can learn to minimize the effects of noise in a novel motor task but also that artificial visuomotor noise can be a useful tool for teaching people to make specific movements. Using noise as a teaching signal promises to be useful for rehabilitative therapies and movement training with human-machine interfaces. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Many theories argue that we choose to make the specific movements that minimize motor noise. Here, by changing the relationship between movements and noise, we show that people actively learn to make movements that minimize noise. This not only provides direct evidence for the theories of noise minimization but presents a way to use noise to teach specific movements to improve rehabilitative therapies and human-machine interface control.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor control; motor learning; noise; redundancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27881721      PMCID: PMC5296406          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00493.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting.

Authors:  J R Wolpaw; N Birbaumer; W J Heetderks; D J McFarland; P H Peckham; G Schalk; E Donchin; L A Quatrano; C J Robinson; T M Vaughan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  2000-06

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The role of strategies in motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Elizabeth Mallia; John Rothwell; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Neural Control Adaptation to Motor Noise Manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Olga Gelina; Garrett Woo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning alternative movement coordination patterns using reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Amber Denomme; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  It's Not (Only) the Mean that Matters: Variability, Noise and Exploration in Skill Learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

4.  Development of an EMG-Controlled Serious Game for Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghassemi; Kristen Triandafilou; Alex Barry; Mary Ellen Stoykov; Elliot Roth; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Derek G Kamper; Rajiv Ranganathan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning.

Authors:  Jack Brookes; Faisal Mushtaq; Earle Jamieson; Aaron J Fath; Geoffrey Bingham; Peter Culmer; Richard M Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Conventional analysis of trial-by-trial adaptation is biased: Empirical and theoretical support using a Bayesian estimator.

Authors:  Daniel Blustein; Ahmed Shehata; Kevin Englehart; Jonathon Sensinger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Reshaping Movement Distributions With Limit-Push Robotic Training.

Authors:  Amit K Shah; Ian Sharp; Eyad Hajissa; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Guiding functional reorganization of motor redundancy using a body-machine interface.

Authors:  Dalia De Santis; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Learning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review.

Authors:  Danielle E Levac; Meghan E Huber; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The dynamics of motor learning through the formation of internal models.

Authors:  Camilla Pierella; Maura Casadio; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Sara A Solla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.