Literature DB >> 16282837

An open-label study of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: comparison of switching versus initiating treatment approaches.

Madelaine M Wohlreich1, James M Martinez, Craig H Mallinckrodt, Apurva Prakash, John G Watkin, Maurizio Fava.   

Abstract

This study compared the stabilized duloxetine dose through approximately 12 weeks of treatment in patients initiating duloxetine therapy with that in patients switching to duloxetine from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder. Patients (n = 112) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (n = 137), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, was randomized to receive duloxetine 30 or 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). At the end of week 1, patients receiving 30 mg QD had their dose increased to 60 mg QD. During the remainder of the study, each patient's duloxetine dose could be titrated on the basis of degree of response within a range from 60 to 120 mg QD, with 90 mg QD as an intermediate dose. At the study end point, approximately one third of the patients in each treatment group were stabilized at each of the 3 studied duloxetine doses (60, 90, and 120 mg QD), and the distribution of stabilized doses among patients initiating duloxetine therapy did not differ significantly from that observed in patients switching to duloxetine. The efficacy of duloxetine in patients switching from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/venlafaxine did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (baseline-to-end point mean changes: 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score, -13.1 vs. -13.5; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, -10.6 vs. -10.3; and Clinical Global Impression of Severity, -2.22 vs. -2.38, respectively). The rate of discontinuation caused by adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (6.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.018). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, diarrhea, and constipation. In the first week of therapy, patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of headache and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Thus, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16282837     DOI: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000185429.10053.c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  9 in total

1.  Clinical consequences of initial duloxetine dosing strategies: Comparison of 30 and 60 mg QD starting doses.

Authors:  David L Dunner; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Craig H Mallinckrodt; John G Watkin; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-11

2.  Open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder not responding to acute treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram.

Authors:  Claudio N Soares; Michael E Thase; Anita Clayton; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Kristen Focht; Qin Jiang; Susan G Kornstein; Phillip T Ninan; Cecelia P Kane
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Using daily interactive voice response assessments: to measure onset of symptom improvement with duloxetine.

Authors:  Heidi K Moore; Madelaine M Wohlreich; Michael G Wilson; James C Mundt; Maurizio Fava; Craig H Mallinckrodt; John H Greist
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-03

Review 4.  Continuation treatment of major depressive disorder: is there a case for duloxetine?

Authors:  Trevor R Norman; James S Olver
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Duloxetine in practice-based clinical settings: assessing effects on the emotional and physical symptoms of depression in an open-label, multicenter study.

Authors:  Madelaine M Wohlreich; Curtis G Wiltse; Durisala Desaiah; Wenyu Ye; Rebecca L Robinson; Kurt Kroenke; Susan G Kornstein; John H Greist
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

6.  Rescue pharmacotherapy with duloxetine for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor nonresponders in late-life depression: outcome and tolerability.

Authors:  Jordan F Karp; Ellen M Whyte; Eric J Lenze; Mary A Dew; Amy Begley; Mark D Miller; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Attributes of response in depressed patients switched to treatment with duloxetine.

Authors:  D Sagman; D McIntosh; M S Lee; H Li; S Ruschel; N Hussain; R E Granger; A C Lee; J Raskin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Assessment in Work Productivity and the Relationship with Cognitive Symptoms (AtWoRC): primary analysis from a Canadian open-label study of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Authors:  Pratap Chokka; Joanna Bougie; Emmanouil Rampakakis; Jean Proulx
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.790

9.  Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  David J Goldstein
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.570

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.