Literature DB >> 21323394

Open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder not responding to acute treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram.

Claudio N Soares1, Michael E Thase, Anita Clayton, Christine J Guico-Pabia, Kristen Focht, Qin Jiang, Susan G Kornstein, Phillip T Ninan, Cecelia P Kane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical evidence indicates that menopausal status might impact on the efficacy of certain classes of antidepressants.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate open-label desvenlafaxine treatment (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) in postmenopausal women who did not achieve clinical response to acute, double-blind treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram. STUDY
DESIGN: This phase IIIb, multicentre study included a 6-month open-label extension phase of patients who did not respond in the initial 8-week, randomized, double-blind acute phase. PATIENTS: Postmenopausal women aged 40-70 years with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder were recruited. PRIMARY INTERVENTION: Non-responders to acute treatment with double-blind desvenlafaxine or escitalopram received flexible-dose, open-label desvenlafaxine 100-200 mg/day for the 6-month extension phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary efficacy assessment was the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) total score. Secondary efficacy outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) and -Severity scales, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report, Visual Analogue Scale-Pain Intensity and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary health assessments were the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire, 5-Dimension EuroQoL Index, Health State Today, Menopause Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, treatment response (≥ 50% decrease in total HAM-D(17) and MADRS score from acute-phase baseline and CGI-I total score ≤ 2), HAM-D(17) remission (total score ≤ 7) and safety. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes.
RESULTS: The efficacy analysis included 123 patients (desvenlafaxine/desvenlafaxine = 64; escitalopram/desvenlafaxine = 59). At final evaluation of the open-label extension phase, mean reductions from acute-phase baseline in HAM-D(17) total scores were -11.33 for the desvenlafaxine/desvenlafaxine group and -11.41 for the escitalopram/desvenlafaxine group. HAM-D(17) response or remission after 6 months of open-label extension phase desvenlafaxine treatment were achieved in 56-58% and 41-48% of patients, respectively. The results of the other secondary efficacy outcome measures and other definitions of treatment response were generally consistent with the primary analyses. The observed adverse events were similar to those reported during previous desvenlafaxine clinical trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder who did not respond to acute, double-blind treatment with escitalopram or desvenlafaxine achieved modest, continued improvement with long-term, open-label desvenlafaxine therapy. Further interpretation of these findings is limited by aspects of the study design (i.e. open-label, non-placebo-controlled) and the lack of randomized comparison groups in the extension phase, which prevents statistical assessment of the efficacy of longer term treatment with desvenlafaxine. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00406640.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21323394     DOI: 10.2165/11586460-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  28 in total

Review 1.  Workshop II: "neuroprotection"--the Lugano consensus.

Authors:  P Riederer; T Brücke; C Buhmann; T Müller; A Schwartz; A Storch; B Winner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Desvenlafaxine and escitalopram for the treatment of postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Claudio N Soares; Michael E Thase; Anita Clayton; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Kristen Focht; Qin Jiang; Susan G Kornstein; Phil Ninan; Cecelia P Kane; Lee S Cohen
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The assessment of anxiety states by rating.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1959

4.  The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ): development, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  A H Clayton; E L McGarvey; G J Clavet
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1997

5.  Venlafaxine in treatment-resistant major depression: a Canadian multicenter, open-label trial.

Authors:  C de Montigny; P H Silverstone; G Debonnel; P Blier; D Bakish
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.153

6.  The naturalistic course of unipolar major depression in the absence of somatic therapy.

Authors:  Michael A Posternak; David A Solomon; Andrew C Leon; Timothy I Mueller; M Tracie Shea; Jean Endicott; Martin B Keller
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Aging, body composition, and lifestyle: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  S S Guo; C Zeller; W C Chumlea; R M Siervogel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Desvenlafaxine succinate: A new serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.

Authors:  Darlene C Deecher; Chad E Beyer; Grace Johnston; Jenifer Bray; S Shah; M Abou-Gharbia; Terrance H Andree
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 9.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Jonathan W Stewart; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Louise Ritz; Melanie M Biggs; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Kathy Shores-Wilson; George Niederehe; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Depressive symptoms are increased in the early perimenopausal stage in ethnically diverse human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women.

Authors:  Pauline M Maki; Leah H Rubin; Mardge Cohen; Elizabeth T Golub; Ruth M Greenblatt; Mary Young; Rebecca M Schwartz; Kathryn Anastos; Judith A Cook
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Drug-drug interactions involving antidepressants: focus on desvenlafaxine.

Authors:  Yvette Low; Sajita Setia; Graca Lima
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Health state utility values in major depressive disorder treated with pharmacological interventions: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  James Brockbank; Taryn Krause; Emily Moss; Anne Milthers Pedersen; Michael Frank Mørup; Outi Ahdesmäki; Jake Vaughan; Thor-Henrik Brodtkorb
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 4.  Hormonal Agents for the Treatment of Depression Associated with the Menopause.

Authors:  Megan Herson; Jayashri Kulkarni
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.