BACKGROUND: The purpose of this initiative was to compare erythropoietin-alpha doses in hemodialysis patients who changed from subcutaneous to intravenous administration. The Manitoba Renal Program switched routes due to concern about erythropoietin-associated pure red cell aplasia. METHODS: We compared the erythropoietin-alpha dosage requirements during subcutaneous administration (3 months pre-switch) and intravenous administration (months 4-6 post-switch). We also compared: hemoglobin, transferrin saturation (Tsat%), ferritin, and percent of patients receiving intravenous iron. The same erythropoietin-alpha regimen was initially used when patients were switched. RESULTS: Of the 628 patients receiving erythropoietin-alpha, the data were complete for 400. The dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 10,425 +/- 7,330 vs. 13,125 +/- 8,638 IU/week; p < 0.0001), despite similar hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 1.1g/dl (114.9 +/- 11.2 g/l) vs. 11.3 +/- 1.0 g/dl (113.5 +/- 10.4 g/l); p = 0.0450) and iron parameters (Tsat 30.9%, ferritin 464 ng/ml (microg/l) vs. Tsat 28.7%, ferritin 538 ng/ml (microg/l)). For the subgroup of 84 patients who maintained target hemoglobin (10-11 g/dl or 110-120 g/l) for both periods, the dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 8,393 +/- 6,242 vs. 10,589 +/- 7,049 IU/week; p < 0.0001) without a change in hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (115.2 +/- 3.0 g/l) vs. 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (114.9 +/- 3.3 g/l); p = 0.5789). When stratified by subcutaneous dose, patients with the lowest dose (<5,000 IU/week) demonstrated the greatest increase (89%), and those with the highest dose (>20,000 IU/week) experienced no increase (-3%). CONCLUSION: Overall, erythropoietin-alpha doses increased by 26% when patients were converted from subcutaneous to intravenous administration. 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this initiative was to compare erythropoietin-alpha doses in hemodialysis patients who changed from subcutaneous to intravenous administration. The Manitoba Renal Program switched routes due to concern about erythropoietin-associated pure red cell aplasia. METHODS: We compared the erythropoietin-alpha dosage requirements during subcutaneous administration (3 months pre-switch) and intravenous administration (months 4-6 post-switch). We also compared: hemoglobin, transferrin saturation (Tsat%), ferritin, and percent of patients receiving intravenous iron. The same erythropoietin-alpha regimen was initially used when patients were switched. RESULTS: Of the 628 patients receiving erythropoietin-alpha, the data were complete for 400. The dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 10,425 +/- 7,330 vs. 13,125 +/- 8,638 IU/week; p < 0.0001), despite similar hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 1.1g/dl (114.9 +/- 11.2 g/l) vs. 11.3 +/- 1.0 g/dl (113.5 +/- 10.4 g/l); p = 0.0450) and iron parameters (Tsat 30.9%, ferritin 464 ng/ml (microg/l) vs. Tsat 28.7%, ferritin 538 ng/ml (microg/l)). For the subgroup of 84 patients who maintained target hemoglobin (10-11 g/dl or 110-120 g/l) for both periods, the dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 8,393 +/- 6,242 vs. 10,589 +/- 7,049 IU/week; p < 0.0001) without a change in hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (115.2 +/- 3.0 g/l) vs. 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (114.9 +/- 3.3 g/l); p = 0.5789). When stratified by subcutaneous dose, patients with the lowest dose (<5,000 IU/week) demonstrated the greatest increase (89%), and those with the highest dose (>20,000 IU/week) experienced no increase (-3%). CONCLUSION: Overall, erythropoietin-alpha doses increased by 26% when patients were converted from subcutaneous to intravenous administration. 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.