Literature DB >> 16282574

Effects of knee flexion angles for graft fixation on force distribution in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament grafts.

Kazutomo Miura1, Savio L-Y Woo, Ragan Brinkley, Yin-Chih Fu, Sabrina Noorani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, overloading either 1 of the 2 grafts should be avoided to decrease the risk of graft failure. HYPOTHESIS: Overloading of the posterolateral graft may occur when it is fixed at 30 degrees of knee flexion because the posterolateral bundle is elongated as the knee approaches extension. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten human cadaveric knees were tested at (1) intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament-deficient, (3) double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the anteromedial and posterolateral grafts fixed at 60 degrees of flexion and full extension, respectively (fixation 60/FE), and (4) double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with both grafts fixed at 30 degrees of flexion simultaneously (fixation 30/30). Two external loading conditions simulating clinical examinations were used: (1) 134-N anterior tibial load and (2) combined rotatory loads of 10 N x m valgus and 5 N x m internal tibial torques. Data on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the 2 bundles of the intact anterior cruciate ligament and the respective grafts were obtained.
RESULTS: In response to 134-N anterior tibial load, knee kinematics and in situ force in the grafts were similar to the intact knee for both fixation protocols. The force in the anteromedial graft for fixation 60/FE was 34% higher, whereas the posterolateral graft for fixation 30/30 was 46% higher, compared with the intact anteromedial and posterolateral bundles, respectively. In response to combined rotatory loads, the posterolateral graft for fixation 30/30 carried 67% higher load than did the intact posterolateral bundle.
CONCLUSION: Fixation 30/30 overloaded the posterolateral graft, whereas fixation 60/FE overloaded the anteromedial graft. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, even though overall forces in the graft are the same as intact anterior cruciate ligament, the force distributions may not be the same as the intact bundles, and overloading of 1 of the 2 grafts may occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16282574     DOI: 10.1177/0363546505281814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  27 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Songcen Lu; Chad Hume; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Yuichi Hoshino; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexis Chiang Colvin; Wei Shen; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study in rabbits.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Nicolas Efstathopoulos; Ioannis Sourlas; Anastasia Pilichou; Georgios Papachristou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparable results between lateralized single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Yuki Kato; Sheila J M Ingham; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Takashi Horaguchi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with G-ST.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Takehiko Matsushita
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-06

7.  Effect of fixation angle and graft tension in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Yusuke Sasaki; Shih-Sheng Chang; Masataka Fujii; Daisuke Araki; Junjun Zhu; Brandon Marshall; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation first in anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best restores knee kinematics.

Authors:  Libin Zheng; Soheil Sabzevari; Brandon Marshall; Junjun Zhu; Monica A Linde; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft rotation on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Levent Surer; Konstantinos Michail; Murat Koken; Can Yapici; Junjun Zhu; Brandon D Marshall; Monica A Linde; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Effect of graft fixation sequence on knee joint biomechanics in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Dongliang Shi; Jingbin Zhou; Can Yapici; Monica Linde-Rosen; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.