BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein E (ApoE) e4 polymorphism is linked to increased mortality rates, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiovascular disease in older people, but previous studies have largely failed to detect an effect on self-reported mobility disability. We hypothesized that poor performance on mobility-related tests may provide a better measure of effects, and we aimed to estimate the extent to which the ApoE e4 allele increases risks of poor performance on measured mobility and self-reported mobility disability compared to e3/3, in a medium-sized population cohort. METHODS: Data were from 1262 people at baseline older than 65 years from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), followed up for 6 years. Age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models were used to explore associations. RESULTS: At baseline, those individuals with an e4 allele had an odds ratio of 2.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.90) for poor performance on gait speed testing (<0.4 m/s) and 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.16) for five chair stands (> or =20 s), compared to those with e3/3 status. At follow-up, associations between e4 status and incident poor performance on the chair stand test was significant. Associations with self-reported inability or need for help walking for 5 minutes or for climbing 15 steps were nonsignificant throughout. CONCLUSIONS: The ApoE e4 polymorphism is associated with a substantial excess of mobility limitation. The impact is detectable by performance testing, but not by self-reports. Poor results on mobility performance tests may provide a phenotype of ageing.
BACKGROUND: The apolipoprotein E (ApoE) e4 polymorphism is linked to increased mortality rates, Alzheimer's disease, and cardiovascular disease in older people, but previous studies have largely failed to detect an effect on self-reported mobility disability. We hypothesized that poor performance on mobility-related tests may provide a better measure of effects, and we aimed to estimate the extent to which the ApoE e4 allele increases risks of poor performance on measured mobility and self-reported mobility disability compared to e3/3, in a medium-sized population cohort. METHODS: Data were from 1262 people at baseline older than 65 years from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), followed up for 6 years. Age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models were used to explore associations. RESULTS: At baseline, those individuals with an e4 allele had an odds ratio of 2.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.90) for poor performance on gait speed testing (<0.4 m/s) and 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.16) for five chair stands (> or =20 s), compared to those with e3/3 status. At follow-up, associations between e4 status and incident poor performance on the chair stand test was significant. Associations with self-reported inability or need for help walking for 5 minutes or for climbing 15 steps were nonsignificant throughout. CONCLUSIONS: The ApoE e4 polymorphism is associated with a substantial excess of mobility limitation. The impact is detectable by performance testing, but not by self-reports. Poor results on mobility performance tests may provide a phenotype of ageing.
Authors: Marja J Aartsen; Carolien H M Smits; Theo van Tilburg; Kees C P M Knipscheer; Dorly J H Deeg Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: D Carmelli; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; G E Swan; L M Jack; T Reed; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: D Carmelli; C DeCarli; G E Swan; M Kelly-Hayes; P A Wolf; T Reed; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: J W Kardaun; L White; H E Resnick; H Petrovitch; S M Marcovina; A M Saunders; D J Foley; R J Havlik Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Robert S Wilson; Todd L Beck; Jeremiah F Kelly; David A Bennett Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2009 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Ozioma C Okonkwo; Michael L Alosco; Beth A Jerskey; Lawrence H Sweet; Brian R Ott; Geoffrey Tremont Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Raj C Shah; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Sue E Leurgans; Robert S Wilson; Gunnar B Andersson; David A Bennett Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Elizabeth B Fauth; Sarah Schwartz; Joann T Tschanz; Truls Østbye; Christopher Corcoran; Maria C Norton Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Alexander M Kulminski; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Konstantin G Arbeev; Kenneth G Manton; Junko Oshima; George M Martin; Dora Il'yasova; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alexander Kulminski; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Konstantin G Arbeev; Kenneth G Manton; Junko Oshima; George M Martin; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2008-02-04 Impact factor: 10.668