BACKGROUND: The utility of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) type as an indicator of genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer disease (AD) depends on the reliability of typing. Although ApoE protein isoform phenotyping is generally assumed equivalent to genotyping from DNA, phenotype-genotype differences have been reported. METHODS: ApoE genotype and phenotype results were examined for 3564 older (ages 71-93 years) Japanese-American male participants of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, an ongoing population-based study of aging and dementia. RESULTS: Both methods demonstrated similar associations of ApoE type with AD: a direct association with ApoE4 and a less dramatic inverse association ApoE2. Advanced age did not appear to influence the ApoE4-AD association. The association with AD among ApoE4 homozygotes [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] was higher than expected based on an observed OR of 2.0 in heterozygotes. Phenotype-genotype nonconcordance was more frequent for ApoE2 than for ApoE4. The ApoE2 phenotype occurred at a frequency of 7.9% vs a genotype frequency of 4.9%, corresponding to a probability of 56% that an individual with ApoE2 phenotype had the same genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas E4 and E2 phenotypes and genotypes were comparably associated with AD, neither method would be expected to substantially improve the efficiency of case finding in the context of population screening beyond prediction based on age and education. Nonconcordance of phenotype and genotype was substantial for E2 and modest for E4 in this population. The ApoE4-AD association was independent of age.
BACKGROUND: The utility of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) type as an indicator of genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer disease (AD) depends on the reliability of typing. Although ApoE protein isoform phenotyping is generally assumed equivalent to genotyping from DNA, phenotype-genotype differences have been reported. METHODS:ApoE genotype and phenotype results were examined for 3564 older (ages 71-93 years) Japanese-American male participants of the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study, an ongoing population-based study of aging and dementia. RESULTS: Both methods demonstrated similar associations of ApoE type with AD: a direct association with ApoE4 and a less dramatic inverse association ApoE2. Advanced age did not appear to influence the ApoE4-AD association. The association with AD among ApoE4 homozygotes [odds ratio (OR) = 14.7] was higher than expected based on an observed OR of 2.0 in heterozygotes. Phenotype-genotype nonconcordance was more frequent for ApoE2 than for ApoE4. The ApoE2 phenotype occurred at a frequency of 7.9% vs a genotype frequency of 4.9%, corresponding to a probability of 56% that an individual with ApoE2 phenotype had the same genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas E4 and E2 phenotypes and genotypes were comparably associated with AD, neither method would be expected to substantially improve the efficiency of case finding in the context of population screening beyond prediction based on age and education. Nonconcordance of phenotype and genotype was substantial for E2 and modest for E4 in this population. The ApoE4-AD association was independent of age.
Authors: Helen Petrovitch; G Webster Ross; Qimei He; Jane Uyehara-Lock; William Markesbery; Daron Davis; James Nelson; Kamal Masaki; Lenore Launer; Lon R White Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Shahram Oveisgharan; Aron S Buchman; Lei Yu; Jose Farfel; Vladimir Hachinski; Chris Gaiteri; Philip L De Jager; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Chang Kyun Choi; Sun Seog Kweon; Young Hoon Lee; Hae Sung Nam; Kyeong Soo Park; So Yeon Ryu; Seong Woo Choi; Hye Yeon Kim; Min Ho Shin Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 2.153