Literature DB >> 16281071

Prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21) and inv(16)].

G Perea1, A Lasa, A Aventín, A Domingo, N Villamor, M Paz Queipo de Llano, A Llorente, J Juncà, C Palacios, C Fernández, M Gallart, L Font, M Tormo, L Florensa, J Bargay, J M Martí, P Vivancos, P Torres, J J Berlanga, I Badell, S Brunet, J Sierra, J F Nomdedéu.   

Abstract

Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t(8;21) or inv(16) have a good prognosis with current anthracycline- and cytarabine-based protocols. Tandem analysis with flow cytometry (FC) and real-time RT-PCR (RQ-PCR) was applied to 55 patients, 28 harboring a t(8;21) and 27 an inv(16), including one case with a novel CBFbeta/MYH11 transcript. A total of 31% (n=17) of CR patients relapsed: seven with t(8;21) and 10 with inv(16). The mean amount of minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by FC in relapsed and nonrelapsed patients was markedly different: 0.3 vs 0.08% (P=0.002) at the end of treatment. The mean number of fusion transcript copies/ ABL x 10(4) also differed between relapsed and non-relapsed patients: 2385 vs 122 (P=0.001) after induction, 56 vs 7.6 after intensification (P=0.0001) and 75 vs 3.3 (P=0.0001) at the end of chemotherapy. Relapses were more common in patients with FC MRD level >0.1% at the end of treatment than in patients with < or = 0.1%: cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 67 and 21% (P=0.03), respectively. Likewise, using RQ-PCR, a cutoff level of >10 copies at the end of treatment correlated with a high risk of relapse: CIR was 75% for patients with RQ-PCR >10 compared to 21% for patients with RQ-PCR levels < or = 10 (P=0.04). Combined use of FC and RQ-PCR may improve MRD detection, and provide useful clinical information on relapse kinetics in AML patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16281071     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  40 in total

1.  Impact of pretransplantation minimal residual disease, as detected by multiparametric flow cytometry, on outcome of myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Roland B Walter; Ted A Gooley; Brent L Wood; Filippo Milano; Min Fang; Mohamed L Sorror; Elihu H Estey; Alexander I Salter; Emily Lansverk; Jason W Chien; Ajay K Gopal; Frederick R Appelbaum; John M Pagel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Activating internal tandem duplication mutations of the fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3-ITD) at complete response and relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Sherry Pierce; Naval Daver; Tapan Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Raja Luthra; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Life after transplant: are we becoming high maintenance in AML?

Authors:  A M Brunner; A T Fathi; Y B Chen
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  New approaches for the detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Anna van Rhenen; Bijan Moshaver; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Gerrit Jan Schuurhuis
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Minimal residual disease eradication with epigenetic therapy in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brittany Knick Ragon; Naval Daver; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Betul Oran; Maro Ohanian; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Naveen Pemmaraju; Hagop M Kantarjian; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease quantitation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  David Shook; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Margaret L Gulley; Thomas C Shea; Yuri Fedoriw
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 5.568

8.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22).

Authors:  Lixia Zhang; Qinghua Li; Wei Li; Bingcheng Liu; Ying Wang; Dong Lin; Chunlin Zhou; Chengwen Li; Jianxiang Wang; Yingchang Mi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: establishment of indications on the basis of individual risk stratification.

Authors:  Axel Rolf Zander; Ulrike Bacher; Jürgen Finke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Xueyuan Cao; Stanley B Pounds; Sheila A Shurtleff; Kathleen Y Wang; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Jeffrey Jacobsen; Raul C Ribeiro; Gary V Dahl; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey W Taub; Barbara Degar; Wing Leung; James R Downing; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.