Literature DB >> 16279582

An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Anne L Langston1, Marilyn McCallum, Marion K Campbell, Clare Robertson, Stuart H Ralston.   

Abstract

Although, consumer involvement in individual studies is often limited, their involvement in guiding health research is generally considered to be beneficial. This paper outlines our experiences of an integrated relationship between the organisers of a clinical trial and a consumer organisation. The PRISM trial is a UK multicentre, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment strategies for Paget's disease of the bone. The National Association for the Relief of Paget's Disease (NARPD) is the only UK support group for sufferers of Paget's disease and has worked closely with the PRISM team from the outset. NARPD involvement is integral to the conduct of the trial and specific roles have included: peer-review; trial steering committee membership; provision of advice to participants, and promotion of the trial amongst Paget's disease patients. The integrated relationship has yielded benefits to both the trial and the consumer organisation. The benefits for the trial have included: recruitment of participants via NARPD contacts; well-informed participants; unsolicited patient advocacy of the trial; and interested and pro-active collaborators. For the NARPD and Paget's disease sufferers, benefits have included: increased awareness of Paget's disease; increased access to relevant health research; increased awareness of the NARPD services; and wider transfer of diagnosis and management knowledge to/from health care professionals. Our experience has shown that an integrated approach between a trial team and a consumer organisation is worthwhile. Adoption of such an approach in other trials may yield significant improvements in recruitment and quality of participant information flow. There are, however, resource implications for both parties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279582     DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn065oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  16 in total

1.  Addressing Deficits and Injustices: The Potential Epistemic Contributions of Patients to Research.

Authors:  Katrina Hutchison; Wendy Rogers; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-12

2.  Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Rosemary Barber; Jonathan D Boote; Glenys D Parry; Cindy L Cooper; Philippa Yeeles; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Close to the bench as well as at the bedside: involving service users in all phases of translational research.

Authors:  Felicity Callard; Diana Rose; Til Wykes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  'The missing links': understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Sarah A Buckland; Helen Hayes; Maryrose Tarpey
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Participants in research: contract to run a trial should include patient-researchers in steering groups.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-09

Review 7.  A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Victoria Szydlowski; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Stanley Ip; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Rachael Fleurence; David H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Promoting equity at the population level: Putting the foundational principles into practice through disability advocacy.

Authors:  Jagriti 'Jackie' Bhattarai; Jacob Bentley; Whitney Morean; Stephen T Wegener; Keshia M Pollack Porter
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 9.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

10.  Parents' perceptions on offspring risk and prevention of anxiety and depression: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helma Festen; Karen Schipper; Sybolt O de Vries; Catrien G Reichart; Tineke A Abma; Maaike H Nauta
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2014-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.