Literature DB >> 16278665

Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

A Hackshaw1, A Knight, P Barrett-Lee, R Leonard.   

Abstract

Surrogate markers may help predict the effects of first-line treatment on survival. This metaregression analysis examines the relationship between several surrogate markers and survival in women with advanced breast cancer after receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). From a systematic literature review, we identified 42 randomised trials. The surrogate markers were complete or partial tumour response, progressive disease and time to progression. The treatment effect on survival was quantified by the hazard ratio. The treatment effect on each surrogate marker was quantified by the odds ratio (or ratio of median time to progression). The relationship between survival and each surrogate marker was assessed by a weighted linear regression of the hazard ratio against the odds ratio. There was a significant linear association between survival and complete or partial tumour response (P<0.001, R(2)=34%), complete tumour response (P=0.02, R(2)=12%), progressive disease (P<0.001, R(2)=38%) and time to progression (P<0.0001, R(2)=56%); R(2) is the proportion of the variability in the treatment effect on survival that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. Time to progression may be a useful surrogate marker for predicting survival in women receiving first-line anthracycline chemotherapy and could be used to estimate the survival benefit in future trials of first-line chemotherapy compared to FAC or FEC. The other markers, tumour response and progressive disease, were less good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16278665      PMCID: PMC2361525          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  46 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing two different modalities of administration of the same cytotoxic drugs in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Pierga; M Jouve; B Asselain; P Beuzeboc; T Dorval; T Palangie; V Dieras; E Garcia-Giralt; S Scholl; P Pouillart
Journal:  J Infus Chemother       Date:  1995

2.  Concurrent tamoxifen (TAM) + cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) versus TAM + delayed CEF after six months of endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer--a randomized trial from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  P Pfeiffer; C Rose; B Ejlertsen; M Andersson; D Pedersen; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

Authors:  J M Nabholtz; H J Senn; W R Bezwoda; D Melnychuk; L Deschênes; J Douma; T A Vandenberg; B Rapoport; R Rosso; V Trillet-Lenoir; J Drbal; A Molino; J W Nortier; D J Richel; T Nagykalnai; P Siedlecki; N Wilking; J Y Genot; P S Hupperets; F Pannuti; D Skarlos; E M Tomiak; M Murawsky; M Alakl; M Aapro
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Doubling of the epirubicin dosage within the 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen: a prospective, randomized, multicentric study on antitumor effect and quality of life in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  A Riccardi; C Tinelli; S Brugnatelli; P Pugliese; V Giardina; M Giordano; M Danova; A Richetti; S Fava; E Rinaldi; V Fregoni; G Trotti; A Poli
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Comparison of CAF versus CMFP in metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  F J Cummings; R Gelman; J Horton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A comparison of intermittent vs. continuous and of adriamycin vs. methotrexate 5-drug chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Authors:  D C Tormey; V E Weinberg; L A Leone; O J Glidewell; M Perloff; B J Kennedy; E Cortes; R T Silver; R B Weiss; J Aisner
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Ineffectiveness of levamisole in prolonging remission or survival of women treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil for good-risk metastatic breast carcinoma: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial.

Authors:  J T Carpenter; R V Smalley; M Raney; C L Vogel; R S Weiner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-09

8.  Adriamycin versus methotrexate in five-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  H B Muss; D R White; F Richards; M R Cooper; J J Stuart; D V Jackson; L Rhyne; C L Spurr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Alonso; J M Tabernero; B Ojeda; M Llanos; C Solà; M A Climent; M A Seguí; J J López
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Does chemotherapy improve survival in advanced breast cancer? A statistical overview.

Authors:  R P A'Hern; S R Ebbs; M B Baum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  27 in total

1.  Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials.

Authors:  Kohei Shitara; Junko Ikeda; Tomoya Yokota; Daisuke Takahari; Takashi Ura; Kei Muro; Keitaro Matsuo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Learning from clinical trials of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade.

Authors:  Judith M Versluis; Georgina V Long; Christian U Blank
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nathan R Foster; Lindsay A Renfro; Steven E Schild; Mary W Redman; Xiaofei F Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Keyue Ding; Penelope A Bradbury; Suresh S Ramalingam; David R Gandara; Taro Shibata; Nagahiro Saijo; Everett E Vokes; Alex A Adjei; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Surrogacy of tumor response and progression-free survival for overall survival in metastatic breast cancer resistant to both anthracyclines and taxanes.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Matsubara; Satomi Sakabayashi; Tsutomu Nishimura; Takanori Ishida; Noriaki Ohuchi; Satoshi Teramukai; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Impact of the first tumor response at eight weeks on overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Lennart Blomqvist; Thomas Hatschek; Lena Carlsson; Zakaria Einbeigi; Barbro Linderholm; Birgitta Lindh; Niklas Loman; Martin Malmberg; Samuel Rotstein; Martin Söderberg; Marie Sundqvist; Thomas M Walz; Gunnar Aström; Hirofumi Fujii; Hans Jacobsson; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Vera Zietemann; Raffaella Gothe; Ruth Schwarzer; Annette Conrads-Frank; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Björn Stollenwerk; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 9.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Issues in applying multi-arm multi-stage methodology to a clinical trial in prostate cancer: the MRC STAMPEDE trial.

Authors:  Matthew R Sydes; Mahesh K B Parmar; Nicholas D James; Noel W Clarke; David P Dearnaley; Malcolm D Mason; Rachel C Morgan; Karen Sanders; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.