Literature DB >> 16275231

Association of endometriosis with body size and figure.

Mary L Hediger1, Heather J Hartnett, Germaine M Buck Louis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body size and perceived figure, both current and historical, are associated with a diagnosis of endometriosis on laparoscopy.
DESIGN: Cohort study of consecutively identified patients undergoing laparoscopy for tubal sterilization or as a diagnostic procedure.
SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENT(S): A cohort of 84 women aged 18-40 years. Endometriosis was visualized in 32 cases; 52 women (controls) had no visualized endometriosis, including 22 undergoing tubal sterilization and 30 with other gynecologic pathology. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) from self-report and perception of body figure were compared for their ability to predict case status (diagnosed endometriosis), using logistic regression models. Longitudinal trends in BMI based on perceived figure at 5-year intervals from age 15 years were compared using mixed linear models. RESULT(S): Based on self-report, women diagnosed with endometriosis were taller, thinner, and had a significantly lower BMI. In this series, cases were more likely to be late maturers (menarche at > or = 14 y) and late to initiate sexual activity (> or = 21 y), and they were less likely to be gravid, parous, and a current smoker. Adjusting for age (in years), being tall (height > or = 68 in), and parity (yes vs. no), a higher current BMI was statistically protective for a diagnosis of endometriosis, regardless of whether BMI was determined by self-report (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.99) or from perceived figure (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). For every unit increase in BMI (kg/m2), there was an approximate 12%-14% decrease in the likelihood of being diagnosed with endometriosis. In an adjusted repeated measures model, BMI was 21.3 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 (estimate +/- SE) for women with endometriosis, compared with 23.2 +/- 0.4 kg/m2 for the controls, a difference over all ages of -1.9 +/- 0.8 kg/m2. This is a consistent difference of about 10 lb at every age, assuming an average height of about 64.5 in. CONCLUSION(S): In a laparoscopy cohort, women diagnosed with endometriosis were found to have a lower BMI (leaner body habitus), both at the time of diagnosis and historically. That women diagnosed with endometriosis may have a consistently lean physique during adolescence and young adulthood lends support to the suggestion of there being an in utero or early childhood origin for endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275231      PMCID: PMC1343487          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  42 in total

1.  Health and fertility outcomes among women surgically treated for endometriosis.

Authors:  R E Batt; G M Buck; R A Smith
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1997-08

2.  Characteristics related to the prevalence of minimal or mild endometriosis in infertile women. Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis.

Authors:  S Bérubé; S Marcoux; R Maheux
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Epidemiologic determinants of endometriosis: a hospital-based case-control study.

Authors:  L B Signorello; B L Harlow; D W Cramer; D Spiegelman; J A Hill
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 5.  Diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  A J Duleba
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Epidemiology of endometriosis in a Norwegian county.

Authors:  M H Moen; B Schei
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  In utero exposures and the incidence of endometriosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Karin B Michels; David J Hunter
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women.

Authors:  Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Susan Malspeis; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J M Weiner; B W Whitcomb; R Sperrazza; E F Schisterman; D T Lobdell; K Crickard; H Greizerstein; P J Kostyniak
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Dioxin concentrations in women with endometriosis.

Authors:  A Mayani; S Barel; S Soback; M Almagor
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  50 in total

1.  Organochlorine pesticides and endometriosis.

Authors:  Maureen A Cooney; Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Albert Vexler; Paul J Kostyniak
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  A prospective study of body size during childhood and early adulthood and the incidence of endometriosis.

Authors:  Allison F Vitonis; Heather J Baer; Susan E Hankinson; Marc R Laufer; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Diet and risk of endometriosis in a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Britton Trabert; Ulrike Peters; Anneclaire J De Roos; Delia Scholes; Victoria L Holt
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Beyond Body Mass Index: Using Anthropometric Measures and Body Composition Indicators to Assess Odds of an Endometriosis Diagnosis.

Authors:  Uba Backonja; Mary L Hediger; Zhen Chen; Diane R Lauver; Liping Sun; C Matthew Peterson; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic approach in obese patients with endometriosis: a multivariable regression analysis.

Authors:  Diego Raimondo; Ivano Raimondo; Eugenia Degli Esposti; Giulia Mattioli; Manuela Mastronardi; Marco Petrillo; Salvatore Dessole; Mohamed Mabrouk; Simona Del Forno; Alessandro Arena; Giulia Borghese; Renato Seracchioli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Risk factors associated with endometriosis: importance of study population for characterizing disease in the ENDO Study.

Authors:  C Matthew Peterson; Erica B Johnstone; Ahmad O Hammoud; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Anne Kennedy; Zhen Chen; Liping Sun; Victor Y Fujimoto; Mary L Hediger; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Body size and endometriosis: results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses' Health Study II prospective cohort.

Authors:  Divya K Shah; Katharine F Correia; Allison F Vitonis; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Paolo Vercellini; Paola Viganò; Edgardo Somigliana; Luigi Fedele
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  In utero exposures and endometriosis: the Endometriosis, Natural History, Disease, Outcome (ENDO) Study.

Authors:  Erin Foran Wolff; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Rajeshwari Sundaram; C Matthew Peterson; Zhen Chen; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Birth weight, childhood body mass index and height and risks of endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Authors:  Julie Aarestrup; Britt W Jensen; Lian G Ulrich; Dorthe Hartwell; Britton Trabert; Jennifer L Baker
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.