Mary L Hediger1, Heather J Hartnett, Germaine M Buck Louis. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7510, USA. hedigerm@exchange.nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body size and perceived figure, both current and historical, are associated with a diagnosis of endometriosis on laparoscopy. DESIGN: Cohort study of consecutively identified patients undergoing laparoscopy for tubal sterilization or as a diagnostic procedure. SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENT(S): A cohort of 84 women aged 18-40 years. Endometriosis was visualized in 32 cases; 52 women (controls) had no visualized endometriosis, including 22 undergoing tubal sterilization and 30 with other gynecologic pathology. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) from self-report and perception of body figure were compared for their ability to predict case status (diagnosed endometriosis), using logistic regression models. Longitudinal trends in BMI based on perceived figure at 5-year intervals from age 15 years were compared using mixed linear models. RESULT(S): Based on self-report, women diagnosed with endometriosis were taller, thinner, and had a significantly lower BMI. In this series, cases were more likely to be late maturers (menarche at > or = 14 y) and late to initiate sexual activity (> or = 21 y), and they were less likely to be gravid, parous, and a current smoker. Adjusting for age (in years), being tall (height > or = 68 in), and parity (yes vs. no), a higher current BMI was statistically protective for a diagnosis of endometriosis, regardless of whether BMI was determined by self-report (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.99) or from perceived figure (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). For every unit increase in BMI (kg/m2), there was an approximate 12%-14% decrease in the likelihood of being diagnosed with endometriosis. In an adjusted repeated measures model, BMI was 21.3 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 (estimate +/- SE) for women with endometriosis, compared with 23.2 +/- 0.4 kg/m2 for the controls, a difference over all ages of -1.9 +/- 0.8 kg/m2. This is a consistent difference of about 10 lb at every age, assuming an average height of about 64.5 in. CONCLUSION(S): In a laparoscopy cohort, women diagnosed with endometriosis were found to have a lower BMI (leaner body habitus), both at the time of diagnosis and historically. That women diagnosed with endometriosis may have a consistently lean physique during adolescence and young adulthood lends support to the suggestion of there being an in utero or early childhood origin for endometriosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body size and perceived figure, both current and historical, are associated with a diagnosis of endometriosis on laparoscopy. DESIGN: Cohort study of consecutively identified patients undergoing laparoscopy for tubal sterilization or as a diagnostic procedure. SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals. PATIENT(S): A cohort of 84 women aged 18-40 years. Endometriosis was visualized in 32 cases; 52 women (controls) had no visualized endometriosis, including 22 undergoing tubal sterilization and 30 with other gynecologic pathology. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) from self-report and perception of body figure were compared for their ability to predict case status (diagnosed endometriosis), using logistic regression models. Longitudinal trends in BMI based on perceived figure at 5-year intervals from age 15 years were compared using mixed linear models. RESULT(S): Based on self-report, women diagnosed with endometriosis were taller, thinner, and had a significantly lower BMI. In this series, cases were more likely to be late maturers (menarche at > or = 14 y) and late to initiate sexual activity (> or = 21 y), and they were less likely to be gravid, parous, and a current smoker. Adjusting for age (in years), being tall (height > or = 68 in), and parity (yes vs. no), a higher current BMI was statistically protective for a diagnosis of endometriosis, regardless of whether BMI was determined by self-report (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.99) or from perceived figure (AOR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99). For every unit increase in BMI (kg/m2), there was an approximate 12%-14% decrease in the likelihood of being diagnosed with endometriosis. In an adjusted repeated measures model, BMI was 21.3 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 (estimate +/- SE) for women with endometriosis, compared with 23.2 +/- 0.4 kg/m2 for the controls, a difference over all ages of -1.9 +/- 0.8 kg/m2. This is a consistent difference of about 10 lb at every age, assuming an average height of about 64.5 in. CONCLUSION(S): In a laparoscopy cohort, women diagnosed with endometriosis were found to have a lower BMI (leaner body habitus), both at the time of diagnosis and historically. That women diagnosed with endometriosis may have a consistently lean physique during adolescence and young adulthood lends support to the suggestion of there being an in utero or early childhood origin for endometriosis.
Authors: Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Karin B Michels; David J Hunter Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Stacey A Missmer; Susan E Hankinson; Donna Spiegelman; Robert L Barbieri; Susan Malspeis; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: G M Buck Louis; J M Weiner; B W Whitcomb; R Sperrazza; E F Schisterman; D T Lobdell; K Crickard; H Greizerstein; P J Kostyniak Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2004-10-28 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Maureen A Cooney; Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; Albert Vexler; Paul J Kostyniak Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2010-05-16 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Allison F Vitonis; Heather J Baer; Susan E Hankinson; Marc R Laufer; Stacey A Missmer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Uba Backonja; Mary L Hediger; Zhen Chen; Diane R Lauver; Liping Sun; C Matthew Peterson; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: C Matthew Peterson; Erica B Johnstone; Ahmad O Hammoud; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Anne Kennedy; Zhen Chen; Liping Sun; Victor Y Fujimoto; Mary L Hediger; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Erin Foran Wolff; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Rajeshwari Sundaram; C Matthew Peterson; Zhen Chen; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-12-01 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Julie Aarestrup; Britt W Jensen; Lian G Ulrich; Dorthe Hartwell; Britton Trabert; Jennifer L Baker Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 1.533