OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify risk factors for endometriosis and their consistency across study populations in the Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes (ENDO) Study. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective matched, exposure cohort design, 495 women aged 18-44 years undergoing pelvic surgery (exposed to surgery, operative cohort) were compared to an age- and residence-matched population cohort of 131 women (unexposed to surgery, population cohort). Endometriosis was diagnosed visually at laparoscopy/laparotomy or by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in the operative and population cohorts, respectively. Logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each cohort. RESULTS: The incidence of visualized endometriosis was 40% in the operative cohort (11.8% stage 3-4 by revised criteria from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine), and 11% stage 3-4 in the population cohort by magnetic resonance imaging. An infertility history increased the odds of an endometriosis diagnosis in both the operative (AOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.57-3.76) and population (AOR, 7.91; 95% CI, 1.69-37.2) cohorts. In the operative cohort only, dysmenorrhea (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.28-4.72) and pelvic pain (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.44-5.50) increased the odds of diagnosis, while gravidity (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.75), parity (AOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64), and body mass index (AOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) decreased the odds of diagnosis. In all sensitivity analyses for different diagnostic subgroups, infertility history remained a strong risk factor. CONCLUSION: An infertility history was a consistent risk factor for endometriosis in both the operative and population cohorts of the ENDO Study. Additionally, identified risk factors for endometriosis vary based upon cohort selection and diagnostic accuracy. Finally, endometriosis in the population may be more common than recognized.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify risk factors for endometriosis and their consistency across study populations in the Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes (ENDO) Study. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective matched, exposure cohort design, 495 women aged 18-44 years undergoing pelvic surgery (exposed to surgery, operative cohort) were compared to an age- and residence-matched population cohort of 131 women (unexposed to surgery, population cohort). Endometriosis was diagnosed visually at laparoscopy/laparotomy or by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in the operative and population cohorts, respectively. Logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each cohort. RESULTS: The incidence of visualized endometriosis was 40% in the operative cohort (11.8% stage 3-4 by revised criteria from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine), and 11% stage 3-4 in the population cohort by magnetic resonance imaging. An infertility history increased the odds of an endometriosis diagnosis in both the operative (AOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.57-3.76) and population (AOR, 7.91; 95% CI, 1.69-37.2) cohorts. In the operative cohort only, dysmenorrhea (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.28-4.72) and pelvic pain (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.44-5.50) increased the odds of diagnosis, while gravidity (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.75), parity (AOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64), and body mass index (AOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) decreased the odds of diagnosis. In all sensitivity analyses for different diagnostic subgroups, infertility history remained a strong risk factor. CONCLUSION: An infertility history was a consistent risk factor for endometriosis in both the operative and population cohorts of the ENDO Study. Additionally, identified risk factors for endometriosis vary based upon cohort selection and diagnostic accuracy. Finally, endometriosis in the population may be more common than recognized.
Authors: D W Cramer; E Wilson; R J Stillman; M J Berger; S Belisle; I Schiff; B Albrecht; M Gibson; B V Stadel; S C Schoenbaum Journal: JAMA Date: 1986-04-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Urooj Bakht Khawaja; Ameer Ali Khawaja; Saqib Ali Gowani; Sana Shoukat; Sana Ejaz; Farzana Nawaz Ali; Javaid Rizvi; Fauzia Haq Nawaz Journal: J Pak Med Assoc Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 0.781
Authors: L V Farland; S A Missmer; A Bijon; G Gusto; A Gelot; F Clavel-Chapelon; S Mesrine; M C Boutron-Ruault; M Kvaskoff Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Anna Z Pollack; Germaine M Buck Louis; Zhen Chen; C Matthew Peterson; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Mary S Croughan; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Christopher D Palmer; Amy J Steuerwald; Patrick J Parsons Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.143