Literature DB >> 16275044

Assessment of hip protectors and corresponding hip fracture risk using stress calculation in the femoral neck.

A B Spierings1, S Derler.   

Abstract

As in many countries, a significant increase in the number of hip fractures is predicted due to the demographic changes in the population. To reduce the consequences for the patients and the social costs, hip protectors are considered to be effective in reducing the impact force on the hip and so to reduce the risk of hip fractures. The effectiveness of hip protectors has been investigated as well in experimental impact tests as in clinical studies, but there is still an uncertainty about their mechanical protection effect. Therefore, laboratory tests are an effective way to investigate the mechanical behaviour of hip protectors. A fracture is initiated by exceeding an ultimate compressive or tensile stress. In our model, stresses in the femoral neck are estimated by using the Euler beam formula. A standard femur was defined consisting of all mechanical parameters that have been identified to influence the mechanical resistance to external loads, such as the effective cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), femoral neck width (FNW), centre of mass and other geometric parameters of the femur. In this study the necessary formulae as well as first results of assessing hip protectors on the basis of stresses in the femoral neck are presented. The results show that the methodology facilitates assessment and improvement of hip protectors, as the biomechanical parameters of real femora are the basis of the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275044     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  5 in total

Review 1.  Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Yahaya; Z M Ripin; M I Z Ridzwan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey.

Authors:  P Piscitelli; G Iolascon; F Gimigliano; M Muratore; P Camboa; O Borgia; B Forcina; F Fitto; V Robaud; G Termini; G B Rini; E Gianicolo; A Faino; M Rossini; S Adami; A Angeli; A Distante; S Gatto; R Gimigliano; G Guida
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  [The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

4.  Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing--an international consensus statement (part I).

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The Influence of Fall Direction and Hip Protector on Fracture Risk: FE Model Predictions Driven by Experimental Data.

Authors:  Ellie S Galliker; Andrew C Laing; Stephen J Ferguson; Benedikt Helgason; Ingmar Fleps
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.