Literature DB >> 16271464

Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments.

James R Lackner1, Paul DiZio.   

Abstract

Dynamic perturbations of reaching movements are an important technique for studying motor learning and adaptation. Adaptation to non-contacting, velocity-dependent inertial Coriolis forces generated by arm movements during passive body rotation is very rapid, and when complete the Coriolis forces are no longer sensed. Adaptation to velocity-dependent forces delivered by a robotic manipulandum takes longer and the perturbations continue to be perceived even when adaptation is complete. These differences reflect adaptive self-calibration of motor control versus learning the behavior of an external object or 'tool'. Velocity-dependent inertial Coriolis forces also arise in everyday behavior during voluntary turn and reach movements but because of anticipatory feedforward motor compensations do not affect movement accuracy despite being larger than the velocity-dependent forces typically used in experimental studies. Progress has been made in understanding: the common features that determine adaptive responses to velocity-dependent perturbations of jaw and limb movements; the transfer of adaptation to mechanical perturbations across different contact sites on a limb; and the parcellation and separate representation of the static and dynamic components of multiforce perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271464     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  39 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Adaptation to sensory-motor reflex perturbations is blind to the source of errors.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Augmented dynamics and motor exploration as training for stroke.

Authors:  Felix C Huang; James L Patton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Neural control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertip.

Authors:  Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Multi-compartment model can explain partial transfer of learning within the same limb between unimanual and bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anticipatory control of motion-to-force transitions with the fingertips adapts optimally to task difficulty.

Authors:  Flor A Cianchetti; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Human manual control performance in hyper-gravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Daniel M Merfeld; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cerebellar Prediction of the Dynamic Sensory Consequences of Gravity.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Jerome Carriot; Mohsen Jamali; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Spinal cord modularity: evolution, development, and optimization and the possible relevance to low back pain in man.

Authors:  Simon F Giszter; Corey B Hart; Sheri P Silfies
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.