Literature DB >> 16270852

Leisure items as controls in the attention condition of functional analyses.

Brandon E McCord1, Nancy A Neef.   

Abstract

Leisure items (e.g., games, toys) are commonly made available as controls during attention conditions of functional analyses (Ringdahl, Winborn, Andelman, & Kitsukawa, 2002). However, Ringdahl et al. raised questions about this practice. This paper reviews research that supports and conflicts with the inclusion of leisure items as controls, including a quantitative analysis of relevant articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis over a 10-year period. Data reviewed suggest that practitioners may consider omitting leisure items as controls or including such items strategically based on the accumulation of assessment information.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16270852      PMCID: PMC1226178          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2005.116-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  39 in total

1.  Correspondence between outcomes of brief and extended functional analyses.

Authors:  S Kahng; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

Review 2.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.

Authors:  W K Berg; S Peck; D P Wacker; J Harding; J McComas; D Richman; K Brown
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  An evaluation of contingency strength and response suppression.

Authors:  John C Borrero; Timothy R Vollmer; Carrie S Wright
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

5.  An analysis of the reinforcing properties of hand mouthing.

Authors:  H L Goh; B A Iwata; B A Shore; I G DeLeon; D C Lerman; S M Ulrich; R G Smith
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

6.  On the effects of "quality" of attention in the functional analysis of destructive behavior.

Authors:  D M Richman; L P Hagopian
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

7.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

8.  Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.

Authors:  B A Iwata; M F Dorsey; K J Slifer; K E Bauman; G S Richman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

9.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

10.  Treatment of self-injury and hand mouthing following inconclusive functional analyses.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Marcus; L LeBlanc
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994
View more
  3 in total

1.  False-positive tangible outcomes of functional analyses.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Brian A Iwata; Jill M Harper; Tara A Fahmie; Erin M Camp
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Further evaluation of leisure items in the attention condition of functional analyses.

Authors:  Eileen M Roscoe; Abbey Carreau; Jackie MacDonald; Sacha T Pence
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  On the Standardization of the Functional Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Jessel; Gregory P Hanley; Mahshid Ghaemmaghami
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2019-06-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.