Literature DB >> 16269566

"Hello, hello--it's English I speak!": a qualitative exploration of patients' understanding of the science of clinical trials.

M Stead1, D Eadie, D Gordon, K Angus.   

Abstract

Informed consent may be seriously compromised if patients fail to understand the experimental nature of the trial in which they are participating. Using focus groups, the authors explored how prospective trial participants interpret and understand the science of clinical trials by using patient information sheets relative to their medical condition. An opportunity was provided to hear in the patients' own words how they interpret the information and why there is variable understanding. Respondents struggled to comprehend the meaning and purpose of concepts such as randomisation and double blinding, and found them threatening to their ideas of medical care. Suggestions are made about how to improve the national guidelines on written information for trial participants and pretesting of the information sheets is advocated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269566      PMCID: PMC1734055          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.011064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  21 in total

1.  Breast cancer trials: a patient's viewpoint.

Authors:  H M Thornton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.

Authors:  E Bjørn; P Rossel; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.

Authors:  S Joffe; E F Cook; P D Cleary; J W Clark; J C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Some popular versions of uninformed consent.

Authors:  J L Hutton; R E Ashcroft
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000

5.  Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.

Authors:  F Corbett; J Oldham; R Lilford
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Public understanding of genetics and Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  A Stockdale
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  1999

7.  Attitudes to randomized clinical trials amongst out-patients attending a medical oncology clinic.

Authors:  Peter M. Ellis; Sharon M. Dowsett; Phyllis N. Butow; Martin H.N. Tattersall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Are we getting informed consent from patients with cancer?

Authors:  H J Sutherland; G A Lockwood; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment.

Authors:  W J Mackillop; M J Palmer; B O'Sullivan; G K Ward; R Steele; G Dotsikas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  30 in total

1.  Randomized study of placebo and framing information in direct-to-consumer print advertisements for prescription drugs.

Authors:  Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-12

2.  Presenting quantitative information about placebo rates to patients.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Kathryn J Aikin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Sofia Strömmer; Wendy Lawrence; Taylor Rose; Christina Vogel; Daniella Watson; Joanne N Bottell; Janice Parmenter; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Hazel Inskip; Janis Baird; Mary Barker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  NETT coordinators: researchers, caregivers, or both?

Authors:  Patricia A Jellen; Frances L Brogan; Anne Marie Kuzma; Catherine Meldrum; Yvonne M Meli; Carla L Grabianowski
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-05-01

5.  Improving informed consent: pilot of a decision aid for women invited to participate in a breast cancer prevention trial (IBIS-II DCIS).

Authors:  I Juraskova; P Butow; A Lopez; M Seccombe; A Coates; F Boyle; N McCarthy; L Reaby; J F Forbes
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Characteristics of clinical trials that require participants to be fluent in English.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Omar Pedraza; Yu-Ning Wong; Roland L Dunbrack; Candace L Griffin; Eric A Ross; J Robert Beck
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Health education through analogies: preparation of a community for clinical trials of a vaccine against hookworm in an endemic area of Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Flavia Gazzinelli; Lucas Lobato; Leonardo Matoso; Renato Avila; Rita de Cassia Marques; Ami Shah Brown; Rodrigo Correa-Oliveira; Jeffrey M Bethony; David J Diemert
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-07-20

8.  Why do individuals agree to enrol in clinical trials? A qualitative study of health research participation in Blantyre, Malawi.

Authors:  Joseph Mfutso-Bengo; Paul Ndebele; Vincent Jumbe; Matilda Mkunthi; Francis Masiye; Sassy Molyneux; Malcolm Molyneux
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.875

9.  Influences on older people's decision making regarding choice of topical or oral NSAIDs for knee pain: qualitative study.

Authors:  Dawn Carnes; Yasir Anwer; Martin Underwood; Geoff Harding; Suzanne Parsons
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-04

10.  Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi.

Authors:  Paul M Ndebele; Douglas Wassenaar; Esther Munalula; Francis Masiye
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.