Literature DB >> 16269284

Molecular epidemiology of microbial contamination in the operating room environment: Is there a risk for infection?

Charles E Edmiston1, Gary R Seabrook, Robert A Cambria, Kellie R Brown, Brian D Lewis, Jay R Sommers, Candace J Krepel, Patti J Wilson, Sharon Sinski, Jonathan B Towne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern operating rooms are considered to be aseptic environments. The use of surgical mask, frequent air exchanges, and architectural barriers are used to reduce airborne microbial populations. Breaks in surgical technique, host contamination, or hematogenous seeding are suggested as causal factors in these infections. This study implicates contamination of the operating room air as an additional etiology of infection.
METHODS: To investigate the potential sources of perioperative contamination, an innovative in situ air-sampling analysis was conducted during an 18-month period involving 70 separate vascular surgical procedures. Air-sample cultures were obtained from multiple points within the operating room, ranging from 0.5 to 4 m from the surgical wound. Selected microbial clonality was determined by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. In a separate series of studies microbial nasopharyngeal shedding was evaluated under controlled environmental conditions in the presence and absence of a surgical mask.
RESULTS: Coagulase-negative staphylococci were recovered from 86% of air samples, 51% from within 0.5 m of the surgical wound, whereas Staphylococcus aureus was recovered from 64% of air samples, 39% within 0.5 m from the wound. Anterior nares swabs were obtained from 11 members of the vascular team, clonality was observed between 8 strains of S epidermidis, and 2 strains of S aureus were recovered from selected team members and air-samples collected throughout the operating room environment. Miscellaneous Gram-negative isolates were recovered less frequently (<33%); however, 7 isolates expressed multiple patterns of antimicrobial resistance. The traditional surgical mask demonstrated limited effectiveness at curtailing microbial shedding, especially during symptomatic periods of rhinorrhea.
CONCLUSIONS: Gram-positive staphylococcal isolates were frequently isolated from air samples obtained throughout the operating room, including areas adjacent to the operative field. Nasopharyngeal shedding from person participating in the operation was identified as the source of many of these airborne contaminants. Failure of the traditional surgical mask to prevent microbial shedding is likely associated with an increased risk of perioperative contamination of biomedical implants, especially in procedures lasting longer than 90 minutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269284     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  28 in total

1.  Antimicrobial efficacy of preoperative skin antisepsis and clonal relationship to postantiseptic skin-and-wound flora in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  G Daeschlein; M Napp; F Layer; S von Podewils; H Haase; R Spitzmueller; O Assadian; R Kasch; G Werner; M Jünger; P Hinz; A Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Optimum Operating Room Environment for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections.

Authors:  Sara Gaines; James N Luo; Jack Gilbert; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.150

Review 3.  The role of the healthcare environment in the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms: update on current best practices for containment.

Authors:  Roy F Chemaly; Sarah Simmons; Charles Dale; Shashank S Ghantoji; Maria Rodriguez; Julie Gubb; Julie Stachowiak; Mark Stibich
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06

4.  A pilot study of the noninvasive assessment of the lung microbiota as a potential tool for the early diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Addison K May; Jacob S Brady; Joann Romano-Keeler; Wonder P Drake; Patrick R Norris; Judith M Jenkins; Richard J Isaacs; Erik M Boczko
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  CORR Insights®: Surgical Loupes Worn by Orthopaedic Surgeons Are a Reservoir for Microorganisms.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Mobile phones in the orthopedic operating room: Microbial colonization and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Nada Qaisar Qureshi; Syed Hamza Mufarrih; Seema Irfan; Rizwan Haroon Rashid; Akbar Jaleel Zubairi; Anum Sadruddin; Israr Ahmed; Shahryar Noordin
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-18

7.  Operating room traffic: is there any role of monitoring it?

Authors:  Shital N Parikh; Salih S Grice; Beverly M Schnell; Shelia R Salisbury
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Drug susceptibility and clonality of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in hospitalized patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  K Nomura; E Mizumachi; M Yamashita; M Ohshiro; T Komori; M Sugai; M Taniwaki; Y Ishida
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  A novel anti-influenza copper oxide containing respiratory face mask.

Authors:  Gadi Borkow; Steve S Zhou; Tom Page; Jeffrey Gabbay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbiology of explanted suture segments from infected and noninfected surgical patients.

Authors:  Charles E Edmiston; Candace J Krepel; Richard M Marks; Peter J Rossi; James Sanger; Matthew Goldblatt; Mary Beth Graham; Stephen Rothenburger; John Collier; Gary R Seabrook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.