Literature DB >> 16269108

Correlates of capture of attention and inhibition of return across stages of visual processing.

Jillian H Fecteau1, Douglas P Munoz.   

Abstract

How do visual signals evolve from early to late stages in sensory processing? We explored this question by examining two neural correlates of spatial attention. The capture of attention and inhibition of return refer to the initial advantage and subsequent disadvantage to respond to a visual target that follows an irrelevant visual cue at the same location. In the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (a region that receives input from late stages in visual processing), both behavioral effects link to changes in the neural representation of the target: strong target-related activity correlates with the capture of attention and weak target-related activity correlates with inhibition of return. Contrasting these correlates with those obtained in the superficial layers (a functionally distinct region that receives input from early stages in visual processing), we show that the target-related activity of neurons in the intermediate layers was the best predictor of orienting behavior, although dramatic changes in the target-related response were observed in both subregions. We describe the important consequences of these findings for understanding the neural basis of the capture of attention and inhibition of return and interpreting changes in neural activity more generally.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269108     DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  44 in total

1.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neuronal adaptation caused by sequential visual stimulation in the frontal eye field.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

4.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporally specific sensory signals for the detection of stimulus omission in the primate deep cerebellar nuclei.

Authors:  Shogo Ohmae; Akiko Uematsu; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Been there, seen that: a neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; Fabrice Arcizet; Wei Song Ong; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neural correlates of spatial orienting in the human superior colliculus.

Authors:  Elaine J Anderson; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Investigating a two causes theory of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Satel; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dopaminergic Control of Attentional Flexibility: Inhibition of Return is Associated with the Dopamine Transporter Gene (DAT1).

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Jay Pratt; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.