Literature DB >> 16267889

Myths and perceptions of back pain in the Norwegian population, before and after the introduction of guidelines for acute back pain.

Camilla Ihlebaek1, Hege R Eriksen.   

Abstract

AIM: Deyo's seven "myths" about back pain are based on common misconceptions of causality and therapy of back pain. These myths were alive in the Norwegian population in 2001; this report investigates whether this is true two years later.
METHODS: A representative sample of the Norwegian population in 2003 (n = 1,014) were asked to rate their agreement with the seven myths.
RESULTS: There is significantly less acceptance of all myths except "Most back pain is caused by injuries or heavy lifting" in 2003. Myths concerning the use and importance of X-ray were still common: 43% agreed that "X-ray and newer imaging tests can always identify the cause of pain" and 50% that "Everyone with back pain should have a spine X-ray". Low level of education is still associated with high acceptance of the myths, but the changes from 2001 are most pronounced for these groups.
CONCLUSION: Perceptions in the general population in Norway are slowly changing to be more in accordance with existing knowledge on accurate behaviour and treatment of back pain. This may be related to introduction of new evidence-based guidelines. The difference between educational groups is reduced, but is still a challenge to health professionals and health authorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267889     DOI: 10.1080/14034940510006094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  6 in total

1.  Do "Myths" of low back pain exist among Irish population? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sudarshan Munigangaiah; Navya Basavaraju; Dima Y Jadaan; Aiden T Devitt; John P McCabe
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-07

2.  Clinician, patient and general public beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Adrian C Traeger; Benjamin J Reed; Denise A O'Connor; Tammy C Hoffmann; Gustavo C Machado; Carissa Bonner; Chris G Maher; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  Amanda M Hall; Samantha R Scurrey; Andrea E Pike; Charlotte Albury; Helen L Richmond; James Matthews; Elaine Toomey; Jill A Hayden; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the Quebec population toward chronic pain: Where are we now?

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Manon Choinière; Judy-Ann Connelly
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2017-10-24

5.  Disabling chronic low back pain as an iatrogenic disorder: a qualitative study in Aboriginal Australians.

Authors:  Ivan B Lin; Peter B O'Sullivan; Juli A Coffin; Donna B Mak; Sandy Toussaint; Leon M Straker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Development of a screening tool predicting the transition from acute to chronic low back pain for patients in a GP setting: protocol of a multinational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Nikolaus Aebli; Achim Elfering; Christoph Röder; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Peter Herbison; Paul Hendrick; Suraj Bajracharya; Kirsten Stout; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.