Literature DB >> 16267683

Evaluation of the relation between audiometric and psychometric measures of hearing after tympanoplasty.

Astrid G W Korsten-Meijer1, Hero P Wit, Frans W J Albers.   

Abstract

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the relation between audiometric and psychometric measures after tympanoplasty from the perspective of preoperative selection of patients and postoperative assessment of the results of reconstructive middle ear surgery. Hearing (dis)ability was measured by means of pure-tone audiometry and a validated self-assessment questionnaire: the (modified) Amsterdam Inventory of Auditory Disability and Handicap (m)AIAD. Average hearing thresholds and (m)AIAD scores were evaluated for 80 patients, pre- and 12 months postoperatively. The average improvement of the air conduction threshold in the operated ear was 5.4 (+/-14.3) dB; the average improvement in the (m)AIAD score was 2.9 points (+/-12.1). Although not very strong, the audiometric improvement and increase in (m)AIAD score are significantly related. After the calculation of postoperatively measured mean scores on the (m)AIAD for different 10-dB intervals of postoperative hearing loss averaged over both ears, an interesting relation between the (m)AIAD score and hearing losses emerges. The (m)AIAD score is almost independent of hearing loss for postoperative hearing levels between 25 and 40 dB. Residual hearing loss has to become less than 25 dB before a smaller hearing loss corresponds with a higher (better) (m)AIAD score. For losses larger than 40 dB the (m)AIAD score clearly decreases with increasing hearing loss. Finally, even small residual hearing losses lead, on average, to (m)AIAD scores that are substantially lower than the score for normally hearing subjects. In general, the patient benefit seems related to the magnitude of improvement in the air-conduction thresholds, rather than to the achievement of a certain threshold level. In addition, even small residual hearing losses (less than 25 dB HL) still lead, on average, to (m)AIAD scores that are substantially lower than the scores for normally hearing subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267683     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-0983-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of second-ear stapedotomy with the Glasgow benefit plot.

Authors:  A J de Bruijn; R A Tange; W A Dreschler
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 2.  Fundamental issues in self-assessment of hearing.

Authors:  R L Schow; S Gatehouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Hearing disability in the elderly.

Authors:  M E Lutman
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

4.  Do patients and surgeons agree?: the Gordon Smyth Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  G G Browning
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1997-12

5.  Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.

Authors:  B E Weinstein; J B Spitzer; I M Ventry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Perceived hearing handicap of patients with unilateral or mild hearing loss.

Authors:  C W Newman; G P Jacobson; G A Hug; S A Sandridge
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the elderly.

Authors:  B E Weinstein; I M Ventry
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1983-11

8.  Long-term results of total ossicular chain reconstruction using autografts.

Authors:  T R Kapur; S Jayaramchandran
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Results of middle ear reconstruction: do patients and surgeons agree?

Authors:  G D Smyth; C C Patterson
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1985-05

10.  Development of a short scale for self-assessment of experiences of hearing loss. The hearing coping assessment.

Authors:  G Andersson; L Melin; P Lindberg; B Scott
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1995
View more
  12 in total

1.  General and disease-specific quality of life in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media--a prospective study.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann; Bianca Gerendas; Peter K Plinkert; Mark Praetorius
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 2.  [State of the art of quality-of-life measurement in patients with chronic otitis media and conductive hearing loss].

Authors:  S Lailach; I Baumann; T Zahnert; M Neudert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Health-related quality of life measurement after cholesteatoma surgery: comparison of three different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Max Kemper; Nikoloz Lasurashvili; Thomas Beleites; Thomas Zahnert; Marcus Neudert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Development and validation of the Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test 15 (COMOT-15). Measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media].

Authors:  I Baumann; B Kurpiers; P K Plinkert; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance.

Authors:  William Noble; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Navjot Bhullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: effects of age and hearing acuity.

Authors:  Amanda Lash; Chad S Rogers; Amy Zoller; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Bone-conduction threshold and air-bone gap may predict frequency-specific air-conduction threshold after tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Ethan I Huang; Yu-Chieh Wu; Hsiu-Mei Chuang; Tzu-Chi Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Depression in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A Complication Brewing Unnoticed.

Authors:  Sathish Kumar; Prakash Mathiyalagen; Mathan Kaliaperumal; Sophia Mary Amalanathan; Kumaran Ramesh Colbert
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28

9.  Psychometric characteristics of the chronic Otitis media questionnaire 12 (COMQ - 12): stability of factor structure and replicability shown by the Serbian version.

Authors:  Bojana Bukurov; Nenad Arsovic; Sandra Sipetic Grujicic; Mark Haggard; Helen Spencer; Jelena Eric Marinkovic
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Development and Administration of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media Questionnaire-12 (COMQ-12) and Chronic Otitis Media Outcome Test-15 (COMOT-15) in Kannada.

Authors:  Prashanth Prabhu; Anusha Chandrashekar; Anita Jose; Aishwarya Ganeshan; Lavanya Kiruthika
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.