Literature DB >> 16266830

Desiderata for domain reference ontologies in biomedicine.

Anita Burgun1.   

Abstract

Domain reference ontologies represent knowledge about a particular part of the world in a way that is independent from specific objectives, through a theory of the domain. An example of reference ontology in biomedical informatics is the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA), an ontology of anatomy that covers the entire range of macroscopic, microscopic, and subcellular anatomy. The purpose of this paper is to explore how two domain reference ontologies--the FMA and the Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI) ontology, can be used (i) to align existing terminologies, (ii) to infer new knowledge in ontologies of more complex entities, and (iii) to manage and help reasoning about individual data. We analyze those kinds of usages of these two domain reference ontologies and suggest desiderata for reference ontologies in biomedicine. While a number of groups and communities have investigated general requirements for ontology design and desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies, we are focusing on application purposes. We suggest five desirable characteristics for reference ontologies: good lexical coverage, good coverage in terms of relations, compatibility with standards, modularity, and ability to represent variation in reality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266830     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of Dynamic Biomedical Terminologies: Current Status and Future Challenges.

Authors:  M Da Silveira; J C Dos Reis; C Pruski
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

Review 2.  Bio-ontologies: current trends and future directions.

Authors:  Olivier Bodenreider; Robert Stevens
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 11.622

3.  A framework for using reference ontologies as a foundation for the semantic web.

Authors:  James F Brinkley; Dan Suciu; Landon T Detwiler; John H Gennari; Cornelius Rosse
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 4.  Accessing and integrating data and knowledge for biomedical research.

Authors:  A Burgun; O Bodenreider
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2008

5.  Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support.

Authors:  O Bodenreider
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2008

6.  Experience in Aligning Anatomical Ontologies.

Authors:  Songmao Zhang; Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  Int J Semant Web Inf Syst       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.843

7.  A prototype symbolic model of canonical functional neuroanatomy of the motor system.

Authors:  Ion-Florin Talos; Daniel L Rubin; Michael Halle; Mark Musen; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  A novel information retrieval model for high-throughput molecular medicine modalities.

Authors:  Firas H Wehbe; Steven H Brown; Pierre P Massion; Cynthia S Gadd; Daniel R Masys; Constantin F Aliferis
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2009-02-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.