Literature DB >> 16266335

Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait.

Richard Evans1, Chris Horstman, Mike Conzemius.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the combination of ground reaction forces (GRFs) that best discriminates between lame and non-lame dogs. To compare the sensitivity of force platform gait analysis and visual observation at detecting gait abnormalities in Labradors after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL). ANIMALS: All dogs were adult Labrador Retrievers: 17 free of orthopedic and neurologic abnormalities, 100 with unilateral CCL rupture, and 131 studied 6 months after surgery for unilateral CCL injury, 15 with observable lameness. PROCEDURE: Dogs were walked over a force platform with GRF recorded during the stance phase. Analytic properties of force platform gait analysis were calculated for several combinations of forces. The probability of visual observation detecting a gait abnormality was compared with that of force platform gait analysis.
RESULTS: We determined that a combination of peak vertical force (PVF) and falling slope were optimal for discriminating sound and lame Labradors. After surgery, many dogs (75%) with no observable lameness failed to achieve GRFs consistent with sound Labradors.
CONCLUSION: A force platform is an accurate method of assessing lameness in Labradors with CCL rupture and is more sensitive than visual observation. Assessing lameness with a combination of GRFs is better than using univariate GRFs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Therapies for stifle lameness can be accurately and objectively evaluated using 2 vertical ground reaction forces obtained from a force platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266335     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00067.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  13 in total

1.  A novel mouse running wheel that senses individual limb forces: biomechanical validation and in vivo testing.

Authors:  Grahm C Roach; Mangesh Edke; Timothy M Griffin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-06-21

2.  Evaluation of a novel accelerometer for kinetic gait analysis in dogs.

Authors:  Kyle Clark; Charles Caraguel; Lorne Leahey; Romain Béraud
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Variance associated with walking velocity during force platform gait analysis of a heterogeneous sample of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Alexander M Piazza; Emily E Binversie; Lauren A Baker; Brett Nemke; Susannah J Sample; Peter Muir
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Variance associated with subject velocity and trial repetition during force platform gait analysis in a heterogeneous population of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Eric C Hans; Berdien Zwarthoed; Joseph Seliski; Brett Nemke; Peter Muir
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Kinematic characteristics of myositis ossificans of the semimembranosus muscle in a dog.

Authors:  José Manuel Vilar; Gustavo Ramirez; Giuseppe Spinella; Alfonso Martinez
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  A Wearable Magnet-Based System to Assess Activity and Joint Flexion in Humans and Large Animals.

Authors:  Feini Qu; Brendan D Stoeckl; Peter M Gebhard; Todd J Hullfish; Josh R Baxter; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Variance associated with the use of relative velocity for force platform gait analysis in a heterogeneous population of clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  Nicola Volstad; Brett Nemke; Peter Muir
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.688

8.  Quantitative Comparison of the Walk and Trot of Border Collies and Labrador Retrievers, Breeds with Different Performance Requirements.

Authors:  Brittany Jean Carr; Sherman O Canapp; M Christine Zink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of analgesic therapy on clinical outcome measures in a randomized controlled trial using client-owned dogs with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Sarah Malek; Susannah J Sample; Zeev Schwartz; Brett Nemke; Peer B Jacobson; Elizabeth M Cozzi; Susan L Schaefer; Jason A Bleedorn; Gerianne Holzman; Peter Muir
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle.

Authors:  Flávia Augusta de Oliveira; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Jackson Barros do Amaral; Karoline Alves Rodrigues; Aline Cristina Sant'Anna; Milena Daolio; Juliana Tabarelli Brondani
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.