Literature DB >> 16266173

Tactile information transfer: a comparison of two stimulation sites.

lan R Summers1, Jon J Whybrow, Denise A Gratton, Peter Milnes, Brian H Brown, John C Stevens.   

Abstract

Two experiments on the discrimination of time-varying tactile stimuli were performed, with comparison of stimulus delivery to the distal pad of the right index finger and to the right wrist (palmar surface). Subjects were required to perceive differences in short sequences of computer-generated stimulus elements (experiment 1) or differences in short tactile stimuli derived from a speech signal (experiment 2). The pulse-train stimuli were distinguished by differences in frequency (i.e., pulse repetition rate) and amplitude, and by the presence/absence of gaps (approximately 100-ms duration). Stimulation levels were 10 dB higher at the wrist than at the fingertip, to compensate for the lower vibration sensitivity at the wrist. Results indicate similar gap detection at wrist and fingertip and similar perception of frequency differences. However, perception of amplitude differences was found to be better at the wrist than at the fingertip. Maximum information transfer rates for the stimuli in experiment 1 were estimated at 7 bits s(-1) at the wrist and 5 bits s(-1) at the fingertip.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266173     DOI: 10.1121/1.2031979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin's achievable throughput.

Authors:  Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display.

Authors:  Ali Israr; Peter H Meckl; Charlotte M Reed; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Sensitivity to haptic sound-localisation cues.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Jana Zgheib; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Sean R Mills; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Electro-haptic enhancement of speech-in-noise performance in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Amatullah Hadeedi; Tobias Goehring; Sean R Mills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.