Literature DB >> 16266049

A proposed parent vessel geometry-based categorization of saccular intracranial aneurysms: computational flow dynamics analysis of the risk factors for lesion rupture.

Tamer Hassan1, Eugene V Timofeev, Tsutomu Saito, Hiroaki Shimizu, Masayuki Ezura, Yasushi Matsumoto, Kazuyoshi Takayama, Teij Tominaga, Akira Takahashi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors created a simple, broadly applicable classification of saccular intracranial aneurysms into three categories: sidewall (SW), sidewall with branching vessel (SWBV), and endwall (EW) according to the angiographically documented patterns of their parent arteries. Using computational flow dynamics analysis (CFDA) of simple models representing the three aneurysm categories, the authors analyzed geometry-related risk factors such as neck width, parent artery curvature, and angulation of the branching vessels.
METHODS: The authors performed CFDAs of 68 aneurysmal geometric formations documented on angiograms that had been obtained in patients with 45 ruptured and 23 unruptured lesions. In successfully studied CFDA cases, the wall shear stress, blood velocity, and pressure maps were examined and correlated with aneurysm rupture points. Statistical analysis of the cases involving aneurysm rupture revealed a statistically significant correlation between aneurysm depth and both neck size (p < 0.0001) and caliber of draining arteries (p < 0.0001). Wider-necked aneurysms or those with wider-caliber draining vessels were found to be high-flow lesions that tended to rupture at larger sizes. Smaller-necked aneurysms or those with smaller-caliber draining vessels were found to be low-flow lesions that tended to rupture at smaller sizes. The incidence of ruptured aneurysms with an aspect ratio (depth/neck) exceeding 1.6 was 100% in the SW and SWBV categories, whereas the incidence was only 28.75% for the EW aneurysms.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of standardized categories enables the comparison of results for various aneurysms' geometric formations, thus assisting in their management. The proposed classification system may provide a promising means of understanding the natural history of saccular intracranial aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266049     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.103.4.0662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  52 in total

Review 1.  Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Daniel M Sforza; Christopher M Putman; Juan R Cebral
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Hemodynamics and anatomy of elastase-induced rabbit aneurysm models: similarity to human cerebral aneurysms?

Authors:  Z Zeng; D F Kallmes; M J Durka; Y Ding; D Lewis; R Kadirvel; A M Robertson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Saccular trilobed aneurysm of azygos anterior cerebral artery.

Authors:  Arsen Seferi; Ridvan Alimehmeti; Arben Rroji; Mentor Petrela
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Curvature effect on hemodynamic conditions at the inner bend of the carotid siphon and its relation to aneurysm formation.

Authors:  Alexandra Lauric; James Hippelheuser; Mina G Safain; Adel M Malek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Hemodynamic influences on abdominal aortic aneurysm disease: Application of biomechanics to aneurysm pathophysiology.

Authors:  Monica M Dua; Ronald L Dalman
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.773

Review 6.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 7.  Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Athanasios K Petridis; Marcel A Kamp; Jan F Cornelius; Thomas Beez; Kerim Beseoglu; Bernd Turowski; Hans-Jakob Steiger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Nascent aneurysm formation at the basilar terminus induced by hemodynamics.

Authors:  Ling Gao; Yiemeng Hoi; Daniel D Swartz; John Kolega; Adnan Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Experimental insights into flow impingement in cerebral aneurysm by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry: transition from a laminar regime.

Authors:  Takanobu Yagi; Ayaka Sato; Manabu Shinke; Sara Takahashi; Yasutaka Tobe; Hiroyuki Takao; Yuichi Murayama; Mitsuo Umezu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo Raschi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.