Literature DB >> 16264127

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.

B Willem Schreurs1, J J Chris Arts, Nico Verdonschot, Pieter Buma, Tom J J H Slooff, Jean W M Gardeniers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision of the femoral component of a hip arthroplasty with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem.
METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive femoral reconstructions that were performed between March 1991 and February 1996 with use of the X-change femoral revision system, fresh-frozen morselized allograft, and a cemented polished Exeter stem were followed prospectively. Femoral bone stock defects were classified according to the Endoklinik classification. The average age of the patients at the time of the femoral component revision was sixty-three years. No patient was lost to follow-up, which was performed at a minimum of eight years, but eight patients had died. None of the deaths was related to the surgery.
RESULTS: No femoral reconstruction had been rerevised at a mean of 10.4 years postoperatively. There was one unrecognized intraoperative fracture, which healed following nonoperative treatment. There were three postoperative femoral fractures, all through cortical defects at the level of the tip of the prostheses. All fractures healed after plate fixation, and all femoral implants were left in situ. The average subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle was 3 mm; seven stems migrated > or =5 mm. The average Harris hip score improved from 49 points prior to surgery to 85 points (range, 68 to 100 points) at the time of this review. Subsidence did not affect the Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier analysis, with an end point of femoral revision for any reason, showed a survival rate of 100% (one-sided 95% confidence interval, 100% to 91.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem resulted in an excellent prosthetic survival rate at eight to thirteen years postoperatively. The major problem that occurred was a femoral fracture in four patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264127     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

Review 1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty: the femoral side using cemented implants.

Authors:  Graeme Holt; Samantha Hook; Matthew Hubble
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

3.  Stability of fused versus nonfused THA femoral impaction grafts.

Authors:  Anneliese D Heiner; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery.

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm; Reza Razaznejad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Factors influencing the stability of stems fixed with impaction graft in vitro.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ohashi; Masanori Matsuura; Tsuneyuki Ebara; Yusaku Okamoto; Hironori Kou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Femoral impaction grafting.

Authors:  John A Scanelli; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-01-18

7.  Impregnation of bone chips with antibiotics and storage of antibiotics at different temperatures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nina M C Mathijssen; Pieter L C Petit; Peter Pilot; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter Buma; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  What is the long-term survival of impaction allografting of the femur?

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg; Natalie D Ommen; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Allografting in locked nailing and interfragmentary wiring for humeral nonunions.

Authors:  Wei-Peng Lin; Jinn Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients.

Authors:  K Randhawa; F S Hossain; B Smith; Cyril Mauffrey; T Lawrence
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.