Literature DB >> 19701671

Allografting in locked nailing and interfragmentary wiring for humeral nonunions.

Wei-Peng Lin1, Jinn Lin.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this prospective study, we compared outcomes after repair of humeral nonunions when morsellized fresh-frozen allograft or autograft was used to augment repair by intramedullary nailing. Sixty-five patients with humeral shaft nonunions of greater than 6 months' duration and gross instability at the nonunion site were included and treated by locked nailing, interfragmentary wiring, and bone grafting. Graft type was determined by patient preference. Outcomes assessed included union rate and functional recovery of the arm. Secondary end points included operative blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and complications. Twenty-eight patients with autografts and 36 with allografts were followed up more than 2 years. The baseline conditions of the two groups were similar. The autograft group had greater blood loss and longer operative time than the allograft group. The autograft group also had a longer hospital stay. The healing rate, time to healing, and functional scores did not differ between these two groups. In the autograft group, 43% reported pain and limited mobility as a result of the donor site. We concluded that when used in association with locked nailing for humeral nonunions, allografts can achieve treatment results similar to autografts but without donor site complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701671      PMCID: PMC2816774          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1055-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Nonunion of the humerus after failure of surgical treatment. Management using the Ilizarov circular fixator.

Authors:  V R Patel; D K Menon; R D Pool; R B Simonis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

3.  Locked nailing with interfragmentary wiring for humeral nonunions.

Authors:  Jinn Lin; Hongsen Chiang; Doung-Shoung Chang
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2002-04

4.  Surgical management of diaphyseal humeral nonunion after intramedullary nailing: Wave-plate fixation and autologous bone grafting without nail removal.

Authors:  Ariane Gerber; René Marti; Jesse Jupiter
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Strain imparted during impaction grafting may contribute to bony incorporation: an in vitro study of the release of bmp-7 from allograft.

Authors:  T N Board; P Rooney; P R Kay
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-06

Review 6.  Advances in the management of humeral nonunion.

Authors:  David M W Pugh; Michael D McKee
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Locked intramedullary nailing for difficult nonunions of the humeral diaphysis.

Authors:  I Ilyas; D A Younge
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Recalcitrant posttraumatic nonunion of the humerus: 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft.

Authors:  Keiichi Muramatsu; Kazuteru Doi; Koichiro Ihara; Mitsunori Shigetomi; Shinya Kawai
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-02

Review 9.  Nonunions of the humerus.

Authors:  David A Volgas; James P Stannard; Jorge E Alonso
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Locking compression plates for osteoporotic nonunions of the diaphyseal humerus.

Authors:  David Ring; Peter Kloen; John Kadzielski; David Helfet; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.