Literature DB >> 16264120

Use of distal femoral osteoarticular allografts in limb salvage surgery.

D Luis Muscolo1, Miguel A Ayerza, Luis A Aponte-Tinao, Maximiliano Ranalletta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As diagnostic and therapeutic techniques improve, patients with a musculoskeletal sarcoma should expect longer survival, fewer complications and side effects, and an improved quality of life. Functional longevity of the reconstruction after resection of the tumor becomes a major concern, especially in young and physically active patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mid-term and long-term survival of reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft in a series of patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of eighty reconstructions with a distal femoral osteoarticular allograft following resection of a bone tumor in seventy-six patients. The mean duration of follow-up was eighty-two months. The rates of survival of the allograft and the joint surface were estimated with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Functional and radiographic results were documented according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system at the time of the latest follow-up.
RESULTS: Five patients were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-five allografts in seventy-one patients available for study. Thirteen patients (thirteen allografts) died of tumor-related causes without allograft failure before a two-year radiographic follow-up could be performed. Of the remaining sixty-two allografts, fourteen failed: six failed as a result of infection; four, because of local recurrence; one, because of massive resorption; and three, as a result of fracture. At the time of final follow-up, at a mean of 125 months, forty-eight allografts were still in place. The overall rate of allograft survival was 78% at both five and ten years, and the rate of allograft survival without the need for resurfacing with a knee prosthesis was 71% at both five and ten years. With the numbers available, age, gender, the percentage of the femur that had been resected, and the use of chemotherapy were not found to have a significant effect on the overall allograft survival rates. The patients who retained the original allograft had good or excellent functional and radiographic results.
CONCLUSIONS: The life expectancy for most patients with a highly aggressive or malignant tumor in the distal part of the femur is now several decades. In this study, we found a high rate of survival of distal femoral allograft reconstructions at both five and ten years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264120     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

1.  Distal femoral osteoarticular allografts: long-term survival, but frequent complications.

Authors:  Patrick C Toy; Jeremy R White; Mark T Scarborough; William F Enneking; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of gait parameters in distal femoral replacement using a metallic endoprosthesis versus allograft reconstruction.

Authors:  Fahad AlGheshyan; Moataz Eltoukhy; Khaled Zakaria; Harry Thomas Temple; Shihab Asfour
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-23

Review 3.  [Bridging posttraumatic bony defects. Established and new methods].

Authors:  M Schieker; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Proximal Tibia Reconstruction After Bone Tumor Resection: Are Survivorship and Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement and Osteoarticular Allograft Similar?

Authors:  Jose I Albergo; Czar L Gaston; Luis A Aponte-Tinao; Miguel A Ayerza; D Luis Muscolo; Germán L Farfalli; Lee M Jeys; Simon R Carter; Roger M Tillman; Adesegun T Abudu; Robert J Grimer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Unicondylar osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal femur in a patient with a traumatic osteoaticular defect of the lateral femoral condyle.

Authors:  Ju Hong Lee; Seong Il Wang; Hee Rack Choi; Byung Yun Hwang; Young Jin Lim; Jin Sang Wie; Soon Ho Huh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Resection arthrodesis for giant cell tumors around the knee.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Akshay Tiwari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Haptic robot-assisted surgery improves accuracy of wide resection of bone tumors: a pilot study.

Authors:  Fazel Khan; Andrew Pearle; Christopher Lightcap; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Complications of limb salvage surgery in childhood tumors and recommended solutions.

Authors:  H Ozger; M Bulbul; L Eralp
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.