Literature DB >> 16264118

Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique.

B Sonny Bal1, Doug Haltom, Thomas Aleto, Matthew Barrett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip replacement performed through a small incision theoretically results in less trauma to the underlying structures, reduced blood loss, less pain, and a shorter hospital stay, but it may result in increased complications, particularly early in a surgeon's experience with a new technique. In the present study, we reviewed the early results of two techniques involving the use of smaller incisions; specifically, we evaluated one series of primary total hip replacements that had been performed through two small incisions and another series of total hip replacements that had been performed through a single small incision.
METHODS: Eighty-nine consecutive primary total hip replacements were performed with use of the two-incision technique as described by Mears and Berger; all procedures were performed without cement and with use of fluoroscopic guidance. Outcomes data were reviewed at a minimum of six months following the procedure. The results of these procedures were retrospectively compared with those of a historical control series of ninety-six total hip replacements that had been performed by the same surgeon with use of a single mini-incision technique. No special attempt was made to discharge any patient early from the hospital. In preparation for the use of the two-incision technique, the surgeon attended a two-day seminar that included cadaveric training and mentoring by surgeons who had experience with this technique.
RESULTS: In the two-incision group, nine patients (nine hips; 10%) required repeat surgery because of a femoral fracture that had been identified postoperatively (two hips), dislocation (one hip), a wound complication (two hips), or subsidence and loosening of the femoral implant (four hips). Twenty-two patients (twenty-two hips; 25%) sustained an injury of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and one patient (one hip) had a neuropraxia of the femoral nerve. In the comparative series of ninety-six total hip arthroplasties that had been performed with use of a single mini-incision and a direct lateral exposure of the hip joint, the overall complication rate was 6% (six of ninety-six) and the reoperation rate was 3% (three of ninety-six). The rate of complications associated with the two-incision technique decreased significantly as the surgeon gained experience with the procedure (p = 0.0202).
CONCLUSIONS: Although total hip arthroplasty with use of the two-incision technique was performed by a surgeon who was experienced in the performance of total hip replacement surgery with use of a single small incision, the rates of complications and repeat surgery associated with the two-incision technique initially were very high. While the rate diminished with increasing experience, total hip replacement with use of two incisions and fluoroscopic guidance is a technically demanding procedure that may be associated, especially initially, with higher rates of complications and repeat surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264118     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  32 in total

1.  Thirty-day readmission rate and discharge status following total hip arthroplasty using the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip surgical technique.

Authors:  Wade Gofton; James Chow; K Dean Olsen; David A Fitch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Douglas J Roger; David Hill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  No strength or gait benefit of two-incision THA: a brief followup at 1 year.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman Wood; R Michael Meneghini; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) arthroplasty: learning curves and early outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin J Rasuli; Wade Gofton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

7.  Making minimally invasive THR safe: conclusions from biomechanical simulation and analysis.

Authors:  P C Noble; J D Johnston; J A Alexander; M T Thompson; M M Usrey; E M Heinrich; G C Landon; K B Mathis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Early discharge and recovery with three minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty approaches: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Shelly A Smits
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Anatomical study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with special reference to minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip replacement.

Authors:  Mickaël Ropars; Xavier Morandi; Denis Huten; Hervé Thomazeau; Eric Berton; Pierre Darnault
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.