Literature DB >> 16264083

Informed consent and ethical issues in military medical research.

John McManus1, Sumeru G Mehta, Annette R McClinton, Robert A De Lorenzo, Toney W Baskin.   

Abstract

Informed consent in military research shares many of the same fundamental principles and regulations that govern civilian biomedical research. In fact, much of modern research ethics is grounded in events that occurred in the context of war or government-sponsored research. Despite these similarities and common origins, research in the military has additional requirements designed to preserve service members' informed consent rights. The special nature of the superior-subordinate relationship in the military necessitates careful protections to avoid perceptions of coercion or undue influence on a military subject. Additionally, current legal and regulatory requirements for advanced informed consent significantly restrict the flexibility of the military to conduct research using waiver of consent. This has implications on the ability of the nation to develop effective medical treatments for the global war on terrorism. Nevertheless, work is under way to realign defense research policy with the norms of civilian biomedical practice. Future directions include the adoption of waivers for military emergency research, and the cautious introduction of human subject studies on the battlefield. This paper discusses historical background, regulatory differences, and concerns and challenges of some of these regulatory differences for research personnel that apply to informed consent and waiver of said informed consent for emergency research conducted by the U.S. military.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264083     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Ethics watch: the G.I. genome: ethical implications of genome sequencing in the military.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren C Milner; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Converging technologies: a critical analysis of cognitive enhancement for public policy application.

Authors:  Christos Makridis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  iConsent.

Authors:  M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  CHALLENGES FOR IMPLEMENTING A PTSD PREVENTIVE GENOMIC SEQUENCING PROGRAM IN THE U.S. MILITARY.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  Case West Reserve J Int Law       Date:  2015

Review 5.  Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.

Authors:  Susanne Rebers; Neil K Aaronson; Flora E van Leeuwen; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  How to obtain informed consent for research.

Authors:  Sara Manti; Amelia Licari
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2018-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.