Literature DB >> 16264080

Impact of the Final Rule on the rate of clinical cardiac arrest research in the United States.

Katherine M Hiller1, Jason S Haukoos, Kennon Heard, Jonathan S Tashkin, Norman A Paradis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The federal government placed a moratorium on human emergency resuscitation research in 1993 due to concerns related to informed consent. In 1996, the Food and Drug Administration introduced the Final Rule in order to allow clinical resuscitation research to proceed in special cases without prospective informed consent. It is unclear, however, how this change has impacted the performance of this research.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the potential impact of the Final Rule by determining the number of clinical cardiac arrest studies performed in the United States (US) before and after 1993, and to compare it with the number of studies performed in the European Union (EU) during the same periods.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed for cardiac arrest studies that were prospective, interventional, randomized, and performed in the US or EU from 1983 through 2003.
RESULTS: Of the 3,115 cardiac arrest publications identified, 66 (2%) met inclusion criteria. Of the 40 studies conducted in the US, 24 (60%) were published prior to or during 1993, whereas of the 27 studies conducted in the EU, six (22%) were published prior to or during 1993 (odds ratio = 0.5; 95% confidence interval = 0.3 to 0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant decrease in the number of published clinical cardiac arrest trials in the US since 1993. In contrast, there has been a significant increase in the number of published EU trials since 1993. The current informed consent requirements may have reduced the number of clinical cardiac arrest studies performed in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264080     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

1.  A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent.

Authors:  Katie B McClure; Nicole M Delorio; Terri A Schmidt; Gary Chiodo; Paul Gorman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Ethics and research in critical care.

Authors:  Henry J Silverman; Francois Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Studying community consultation in exception from informed consent trials.

Authors:  Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Optimizing hepatitis C virus treatment through pharmacist interventions: Identification and management of drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Jacob A Langness; Matthew Nguyen; Amanda Wieland; Gregory T Everson; Jennifer J Kiser
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.