Literature DB >> 1626204

Living donor nephrectomy. Complication rates in 490 consecutive cases.

I Blohmé1, I Fehrman, G Nordén.   

Abstract

490 living donor nephrectomies were performed during a 25-year period, all through a retroperitoneal approach. In this report, short-term complications and donor renal function are analysed. There was no mortality. The major complication rate was 1.4%. There were 5 cases of postoperative haemorrhage requiring reoperation, one of which developed non-A-non-B hepatitis. There was one case each of septicemia and pulmonary embolism. All these patients recovered. Minor complications were noted in 13.6% of the cases, mostly bacteriuria or minor pulmonary infiltrates. There were 5 cases of reversible heart disorders and 6 cases of mental disorders. After 6-12 months, all donors had satisfactory function of the remaining kidney, which had increased its GFR by 32-38%. We conclude that the short-term consequences of donor nephrectomy are acceptable. From previous reports, from this unit and from others, it is evident that the procedure does not carry any definite long-term health risks. With a permanent shortage of cadaveric organs and with continued superiority in the outcome of living donor transplantations, this important resource should not be disregarded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1626204     DOI: 10.1080/00365599.1992.11690446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  9 in total

1.  Rib resection for live-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Muzaffer Eroğlu; Necmettin Güvence; Ahmet Kiper; Hasan Bakirtaş; Uğur Ozok; Abdurrahim Imamoğlu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  V A Lawrence; S G Hilsenbeck; C D Mulrow; R Dhanda; J Sapp; C P Page
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  J L Flowers; S Jacobs; E Cho; A Morton; W F Rosenberger; D Evans; A L Imbembo; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy.

Authors:  F J Berends; P T den Hoed; H J Bonjer; G Kazemier; I van Riemsdijk; W Weimar; J N M IJzermans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  I Y Kim; P G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Evolution of minimally invasive surgery for donor nephrectomy and outcomes.

Authors:  Santosh A Olakkengil; M Mohan Rao
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Living donor of the kidney-open-video.

Authors:  Jens G Brockmann; Norbert Senninger; Heiner H Wolters
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain, walking function, respiratory muscle strength and vital capacity in kidney donors: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thiago Tafarel Galli; Luciana Dias Chiavegato; Nathália Risso Santiago; Richard Eloin Liebano
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a step forward in kidney transplantation?

Authors:  George Skrekas; Vassilios E Papalois; Michail Mitsis; Nadey S Hakim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.