Literature DB >> 16261414

How should we inform women at higher risk of breast cancer about tamoxifen? An approach with a decision guide.

Andrew McKay1, Wanda Martin, Steven Latosinsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has been shown to reduce the incidence of invasive breast cancer in women at higher risk. Translating these research results to clinical practice is challenging. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a decision-making guide and process that can be used in clinical practice to inform eligible women of chemoprevention with tamoxifen.
METHODS: A decision guide explaining the benefits and risks of tamoxifen was developed with input from health care professionals and two focus groups of women both with and without cancer. Following consent, 51 eligible women presenting to a multi-disciplinary diagnostic facility for breast problems were given the decision guide/questionnaire to read, fill out and return by mail. Women with further questions or wanting to take tamoxifen were encouraged to re-contact their physicians.
RESULTS: Atypia was seen in 60% of subjects. Median 5-year Gail risk was 3.7 (range 1.7-9.4). Only 6 (11.8% 95% CI = 2.9, 20.6%) women reported they would like to take tamoxifen while 6 (11.8% 95% CI = 2.9, 20.6%) remained uncertain.
CONCLUSION: We have developed a decision-making guide and process that is acceptable to providers and women to identify and inform women at higher risk of breast cancer with regard to chemoprevention with tamoxifen. Few women in this select group, when provided with a balanced decision guide, wished to pursue chemoprevention with tamoxifen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16261414     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-6932-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  7 in total

Review 1.  Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Ropka; Jess Keim; John T Philbrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Deciding on breast cancer risk reduction: The role of counseling in individual decision-making - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah B Blakeslee; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Patricia A Parker; Christine M Gunn; Hanna Bandos; Therese B Bevers; Tracy A Battaglia; Angela Fagerlin; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-06-27

3.  CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 48. What is the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence?

Authors:  Steve Latosinsky; Jean-Francois Boileau; Heather E Bryant; Lisa A Newman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Risk-benefit profiles of women using tamoxifen for chemoprevention.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Lisa A DeRoo; Daniel R Scharf; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Motivators and barriers of tamoxifen use as risk-reducing medication amongst women at increased breast cancer risk: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  B Meiser; W K T Wong; M Peate; C Julian-Reynier; J Kirk; G Mitchell
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Australian clinicians and chemoprevention for women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Louise A Keogh; John L Hopper; Doreen Rosenthal; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 7.  Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review.

Authors:  Purva Abhyankar; Robert J Volk; Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby; Paulina Bravo; Angela Buchholz; Elissa Ozanne; Dale Colins Vidal; Nananda Col; Peep Stalmeier
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.