STUDY DESIGN: A bovine model was used to evaluate the effects of thoracic vertebral screw impingement of the aorta. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histologic and biomechanical changes in aortic wall tissue that was severely impinged by abutting instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Case reports of vascular injury associated with spinal instrumentation generally describe intraoperative injury; some report delayed presentation of large vessel damage. Risks associated with placing instrumentation adjacent to large vessels are largely unknown. METHODS: Six 1-month-old calves underwent left-sided thoracotomies, exposing the anterior thoracic spine and aorta. With the heads removed, screws were inserted in reverse fashion into T6 through T11, leaving the screw tips 1 cm proud and abutting the aorta. After 3, 6, or 12 months (2 calves each), the spines were resected with the adjacent aorta and underwent radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Computed tomography revealed varying degrees of vessel impingement. Although there were no frank ruptures, 96% of aortic specimens showed histopathologic changes, including 52% with wall thinning; 43% were no longer impinged, yet 60% of these had increased collagen (scar). Biomechanical testing of screw-impinged aortas demonstrated a lower failure stress (1.2 +/- 0.5 N/mm vs. 1.8 +/- 0.4 N/mm, P = 0.016) but no difference in failure strain (42 +/- 9% vs. 32 +/- 10%, P = 0.06) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Major impingement of vertebral screws on the aorta caused acute and chronic histopathologic and biomechanical changes in the vessel wall. This model represents a severe form of vessel penetration by a screw that confirms such a "worst case" scenario results in marked compromise of the vessel wall integrity. The sequelae of less severe impingement are unknown.
STUDY DESIGN: A bovine model was used to evaluate the effects of thoracic vertebral screw impingement of the aorta. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histologic and biomechanical changes in aortic wall tissue that was severely impinged by abutting instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Case reports of vascular injury associated with spinal instrumentation generally describe intraoperative injury; some report delayed presentation of large vessel damage. Risks associated with placing instrumentation adjacent to large vessels are largely unknown. METHODS:Six 1-month-old calves underwent left-sided thoracotomies, exposing the anterior thoracic spine and aorta. With the heads removed, screws were inserted in reverse fashion into T6 through T11, leaving the screw tips 1 cm proud and abutting the aorta. After 3, 6, or 12 months (2 calves each), the spines were resected with the adjacent aorta and underwent radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical testing. RESULTS: Computed tomography revealed varying degrees of vessel impingement. Although there were no frank ruptures, 96% of aortic specimens showed histopathologic changes, including 52% with wall thinning; 43% were no longer impinged, yet 60% of these had increased collagen (scar). Biomechanical testing of screw-impinged aortas demonstrated a lower failure stress (1.2 +/- 0.5 N/mm vs. 1.8 +/- 0.4 N/mm, P = 0.016) but no difference in failure strain (42 +/- 9% vs. 32 +/- 10%, P = 0.06) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Major impingement of vertebral screws on the aorta caused acute and chronic histopathologic and biomechanical changes in the vessel wall. This model represents a severe form of vessel penetration by a screw that confirms such a "worst case" scenario results in marked compromise of the vessel wall integrity. The sequelae of less severe impingement are unknown.
Authors: Weijun Wang; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Bin Wang; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-05-31 Impact factor: 3.134