BACKGROUND: Since the late 1980's, data show an association between smoking status and mammography. Women smokers reported 12-15% lower rates than non-smokers. This study investigated whether an association persists in a recent national-level database. METHODS: The sample was women aged 50-75 years from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 52,300). Analyses used two definitions of recent mammography, one based on a one-year interval between exams, the other on a two-year interval. Smoking was classified as current, former, or never. Other covariates included sociodemographic variables, health practices, insurance status and usual source of care. RESULTS: The rate of mammography for current smokers was 16% lower than for never smokers for the past-year interval, and 14.0% lower for the two-year interval. Multiple logistic regression supported the smoking/mammography association. Other covariates associated with lower mammography on both dependent variables were recent Pap test, health insurance/usual source of care, recent dental visit, seat belt use, marital status and age. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for the persistent association between smoking and mammography must be determined. These variables will inform interventions with women who smoke. A key question is whether to intervene on smoking directly or whether mediating variables are sufficient targets of intervention.
BACKGROUND: Since the late 1980's, data show an association between smoking status and mammography. Women smokers reported 12-15% lower rates than non-smokers. This study investigated whether an association persists in a recent national-level database. METHODS: The sample was women aged 50-75 years from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 52,300). Analyses used two definitions of recent mammography, one based on a one-year interval between exams, the other on a two-year interval. Smoking was classified as current, former, or never. Other covariates included sociodemographic variables, health practices, insurance status and usual source of care. RESULTS: The rate of mammography for current smokers was 16% lower than for never smokers for the past-year interval, and 14.0% lower for the two-year interval. Multiple logistic regression supported the smoking/mammography association. Other covariates associated with lower mammography on both dependent variables were recent Pap test, health insurance/usual source of care, recent dental visit, seat belt use, marital status and age. CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for the persistent association between smoking and mammography must be determined. These variables will inform interventions with women who smoke. A key question is whether to intervene on smoking directly or whether mediating variables are sufficient targets of intervention.
Authors: William Rakowski; Michelle L Rogers; Gregory M Dominick; Melissa A Clark Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pranav K Gandhi; William M Gentry; Jeffery L Kibert; Erica Y Lee; Whitney Jordan; Michael B Bottorff; I-Chan Huang Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Evelinn A Borrayo; Lisa Hines; Tim Byers; Betsy Risendal; Martha L Slattery; Carol Sweeney; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna Giuliano Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 2.681