Literature DB >> 16260195

Age-related change in the damage morphology of human cortical bone and its role in bone fragility.

Tamim Diab1, Keith W Condon, David B Burr, Deepak Vashishth.   

Abstract

Application of cyclic loading results in the formation of distinct strain-dependent microdamage morphologies. It is still unknown; however, how the morphology of microdamage affects age-related increase in bone fragility. In this study, four-point bending fatigue tests were conducted on aging human bone (age 26 to 89) in conjunction with histological evaluation of the resultant tensile (diffuse damage) and compressive (linear microcracks) damage to identify the damage morphologies associated with an increase in age-related bone fragility. The results demonstrate that young donors (38 +/- 9 years) had a longer fatigue life (P < 0.05) and formed more diffuse damage than the older donors (82 +/- 5 years) (P < 0.05). In contrast, old donors had a shorter fatigue life and formed more linear microcracks than the younger donors (P < 0.05). Linear microcracks were longer in older than in younger donors (P < 0.05) and were associated with weak lamellar interfaces. Areas of diffuse damage were, however, larger in younger than in older donors (P < 0.05), and these showed no relationship with the lamellar arrangement of bone. These findings show, for the first time, that the propensity of bone to form a particular damage morphology is subject to change with age and that the propensity of young donors to form diffuse damage over interlamellae linear microcracks plays a critical role in the ability of bone to dissipate energy and resist a catastrophic fracture. Age-related changes in damage morphology may therefore be an important contributor to the increased bone fragility in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16260195     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  51 in total

1.  Microcracks and osteoclast resorption activity in vitro.

Authors:  Monika Rumpler; Tanja Würger; Paul Roschger; Elisabeth Zwettler; Herwig Peterlik; Peter Fratzl; Klaus Klaushofer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Age-specific profiles of tissue-level composition and mechanical properties in murine cortical bone.

Authors:  Mekhala Raghavan; Nadder D Sahar; David H Kohn; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Osteocytes--martyrs for integrity of bone strength.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage.

Authors:  Atharva A Poundarik; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.417

Review 5.  Effects of bone matrix proteins on fracture and fragility in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Grażyna E Sroga; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  A histological assessment on the distribution of the osteocytic lacunar canalicular system using silver staining.

Authors:  Satoshi Hirose; Minqi Li; Taku Kojima; Paulo Henrique Luiz de Freitas; Sobhan Ubaidus; Kimimitsu Oda; Chikara Saito; Norio Amizuka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  The bone diagnostic instrument II: indentation distance increase.

Authors:  Paul Hansma; Patricia Turner; Barney Drake; Eugene Yurtsev; Alexander Proctor; Phillip Mathews; Jason Lulejian; Jason Lelujian; Connor Randall; Jonathan Adams; Ralf Jungmann; Federico Garza-de-Leon; Georg Fantner; Haykaz Mkrtchyan; Michael Pontin; Aaron Weaver; Morton B Brown; Nadder Sahar; Ricardo Rossello; David Kohn
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.523

8.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of bone: a recent history.

Authors:  John Currey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hierarchy of Bone Microdamage at Multiple Length Scales.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.186

Review 10.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.