Literature DB >> 16259499

Barriers to breast abnormality follow-up: minority, low-income patients' and their providers' view.

Celia Patricia Kaplan1, Merrill Eisenberg, Pamela I Erickson, Lori A Crane, Susan Duffey.   

Abstract

Little is known about the factors associated with delayed or incomplete adherence to recommendations for follow-up when breast abnormalities are seen in minority women. This study examines barriers to follow-up in a cohort of predominantly minority women, with input from providers, using quantitative and qualitative methods. We conducted telephone interviews with 535 women and inperson, unstructured interviews with 31 providers from three medical facilities in the Los Angeles area. Most patient respondents were <50 years old (59.6%), Latina (84.2%), and unmarried (60.9%); half (49.1%) had six or fewer years of education, and most were foreign-born (83.4%). Data from patient and provider groups identified race/ethnicity, country of birth, financial issues, fear of pain, and difficulty navigating the healthcare system as barriers to follow-up, though certain provider-identified barriers did predict adherence among women. System barriers, not individual patient characteristics, were more salient factors in the follow-up of breast abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16259499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  8 in total

1.  Predictors and barriers to timely medical follow-up after cardiovascular disease risk factor screening according to race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Dana J Edelman; Qian Gao; Lori Mosca
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities.

Authors:  Silvia Tejeda; Julie S Darnell; Young I Cho; Melinda R Stolley; Talar W Markossian; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Time to a Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The Mediating Effects of Health Care Facility Factors.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Abigail Silva; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Outcomes of patients with non-diagnostic bronchoscopy: A clinico-radiological comparison of patients with diagnostic and non-diagnostic bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Sindhaghatta Venkatram; Damaris Pena; Bharat Bajantri; Gilda Diaz-Fuentes
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanette C Reece; Eleanor F G Neal; Peter Nguyen; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in Latina and non-Hispanic white women: the six cities study.

Authors:  Amelie G Ramirez; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Gregory A Talavera; Frank J Penedo; J Emilio Carrillo; Maria E Fernandez; Edgar Muñoz; Dorothy Long Parma; Alan Ec Holden; Sandra San Miguel de Majors; Anna Nápoles; Sheila F Castañeda; Kipling J Gallion
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-05

8.  Outcomes of patients with a non-diagnostic initial bronchoscopy for suspected thoracic malignancy.

Authors:  Maneesh Gaddam; Stephen Paff; Sindhaghatta Venkatram; Gilda Diaz-Fuentes
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.