Literature DB >> 16259062

Percutaneous needle decompression during laparoscopic gastric surgery: a simple alternative to nasogastric decompression.

Woo Jin Hyung1, Changsoo Song, Jae Ho Cheong, Seung Ho Choi, Sung Hoon Noh.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic gastric surgeries are routinely performed with use of a nasogastric tube to decompress the upper gastrointestinal tract. A distended upper gastrointestinal tract can complicate successful laparoscopic gastric surgery as the distention compromises not only the visual field but also the laparoscopic manipulation of the stomach. Since nasogastric intubation is not without risks, we have attempted laparoscopic-assisted gastric cancer surgeries without nasogastric tubes. In this article we describe a simple method of aspirating gastric contents using a 9 cm long 19-gauge needle inserted percutaneously during laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy. First, a 9 cm long 19-gauge disposable needle was introduced through the abdominal wall. This needle was then introduced to the stomach through the anterior wall and the stomach gases and fluids were aspirated by connecting the needle to suction. Thus, a collapsed upper gastrointestinal tract was easily obtained. We performed this procedure instead of nasogastric decompression on twenty-two patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection. The results were good with only one patient experiencing wound infection (4.5%) and one patient with postoperative acalculus cholecystitis (4.5%). There were no patients with either intraabdominal infection or anastomotic leakage and none of the patients needed postoperative nasogastric decompression, except the patient who experienced acaculus cholecystitis. Percutaneous needle aspiration is a very simple and efficient technique with little risk of postoperative complications. It can be used as an alternative to nasogastric tube decompression of the gastrointestinal tract for laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16259062      PMCID: PMC2810570          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative needle decompression: a simple alternative to nasogastric decompression.

Authors:  W J Hyung; J H Lee; K H Lah; S H Noh
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Nasogastric decompression is not necessary in operations for gastric cancer: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Chang Hak Yoo; Byung Ho Son; Won Kon Han; Won Kil Pae
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

3.  Complications of gastrointestinal intubation.

Authors:  C D HAFNER; J H WYLIE; B E BRUSH
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1961-07

4.  Nasogastric decompression following laparotomy.

Authors:  D I Soybel
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan.

Authors:  Toshifusa Nakajima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Reevaluation of routine gastrointestinal decompression after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ho Young Chung; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

7.  Comparison of gastric cancer surgery with versus without nasogastric decompression.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  There is no need for nasogastric decompression after partial gastrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  C C Wu; C R Hwang; T J Liu
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994 Jun-Jul

9.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  B G Wolff; J H Pembeton; J A van Heerden; R W Beart; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; R R Dozois; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon's learning curve period.

Authors:  Chang Hak Yoo; Hyung Ook Kim; Sang Il Hwang; Byung Ho Son; Jun Ho Shin; Hungdai Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Wook Ho Kang; Sung Jin Oh; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Image-based Approach for Surgical Resection of Gastric Submucosal Tumors.

Authors:  Yoo-Min Kim; Joon Seok Lim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

4.  Robotic gastrectomy: the current state of the art.

Authors:  Alessandra Marano; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.720

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.