Literature DB >> 16257617

Patients' perception of preoperative information by interactive computer program-exemplified by cholecystectomy.

Thomas M Kessler1, Bernhard H Nachbur, Wolfgang Kessler.   

Abstract

Patients' perception of preoperative information by interactive computer program informing about cholecystectomy was assessed. Patients were asked to qualify the computer program after hospital discharge by an anonymous questionnaire. Two hundred and fifty-seven of 278 consecutive patients completed the questionnaire resulting in a response rate of 92%. Sixty-three percent were very satisfied and 37% were satisfied, whereas none were dissatisfied or undecided. Patients' satisfaction was not associated with sex, age, surgeon or prior knowledge of computers. Most of the patients considered the clarity of text and illustrations and the volume of information as good or excellent and found the information well adapted to their prior knowledge. Ninety-eight percent stated that they would like to be informed again by an interactive computer program in case of another surgical intervention. Thus, interactive computer programs seem to be a valuable adjunct to written and oral information in the preoperative informed consent procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16257617     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  9 in total

1.  Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: a comparison with standard information.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Mauro Moscucci; Colleen M Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

Review 2.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Shared medical appointments as a new model for carpal tunnel surgery consultation: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alison L Wong; Janet Martin; Michael J Wong; Michael Bezuhly; David Tang
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Impact of a multimedia teaching tool on parental anxiety and knowledge during the informed consent process.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Paton; Sharon K Davis; Nan Gaylord; Xueyuan Cao; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Gillen; H Wirnhier; M Kranzfelder; A Schneider; A Schmidt; H Friess; H Feussner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Surgical Informed Consent Process in Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Jaechan Park; Hyojin Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-07-31

7.  Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.

Authors:  J L J Yek; A K Y Lee; J A D Tan; G Y Lin; T Thamotharampillai; H R Abdullah
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  The impact of patient narratives on medical students' perceptions of shared decision making: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Eggeling; Martina Bientzle; Simone Korger; Joachim Kimmerle
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2021-12

Review 9.  Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: is it time to adopt a modular form of consent for the intervention?

Authors:  L Giordano; D Di Santo; E Crosetti; A Bertolin; G Rizzotto; G Succo; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.