OBJECTIVES: Cytokine mobilization of progenitor cells from bone marrow may promote myocardial neovascularization with relief of ischemia. BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have low numbers of endothelial progenitor cells compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 10 microg/kg/day for five days, was administered to 16 CAD patients. Progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometry; ischemia was assessed by exercise stress testing and by dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increased CD34+/CD133+ cells in the circulation from 1.5 +/- 0.2 microl to 52.4 +/- 10.4 microl (p < 0.001), similar to the response observed in 15 healthy subjects (75.1 +/- 12.6 microl, p = 0.173). Indices of platelet and coagulation activation were not changed by treatment, but C-reactive protein increased from 4.5 +/- 1.3 mg/l to 8.6 +/- 1.3 mg/l (p = 0.017). Two patients experienced serious adverse events: 1) non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) 8 h after the fifth G-CSF dose, and 2) MI and death 17 days after treatment. At 1 month after treatment, there was no improvement from baseline values (i.e., reduction) in wall motion score (from 25.7 +/- 2.1 to 28.3 +/- 1.9, p = 0.196) or segments with abnormal perfusion (7.6 +/- 1.1 to 7.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.916) and a trend towards a greater number of ischemic segments (from 4.5 +/- 0.6 to 6.1 +/- 1.0, p = 0.068). There was no improvement in exercise duration at 1 month (p = 0.37) or at 3 months (p = 0.98) versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to CAD patients mobilizes cells with endothelial progenitor potential from bone marrow, but without objective evidence of cardiac benefit and with the potential for adverse outcomes in some patients.
OBJECTIVES: Cytokine mobilization of progenitor cells from bone marrow may promote myocardial neovascularization with relief of ischemia. BACKGROUND:Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have low numbers of endothelial progenitor cells compared with healthy subjects. METHODS:Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 10 microg/kg/day for five days, was administered to 16 CAD patients. Progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometry; ischemia was assessed by exercise stress testing and by dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS:Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increased CD34+/CD133+ cells in the circulation from 1.5 +/- 0.2 microl to 52.4 +/- 10.4 microl (p < 0.001), similar to the response observed in 15 healthy subjects (75.1 +/- 12.6 microl, p = 0.173). Indices of platelet and coagulation activation were not changed by treatment, but C-reactive protein increased from 4.5 +/- 1.3 mg/l to 8.6 +/- 1.3 mg/l (p = 0.017). Two patients experienced serious adverse events: 1) non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) 8 h after the fifth G-CSF dose, and 2) MI and death 17 days after treatment. At 1 month after treatment, there was no improvement from baseline values (i.e., reduction) in wall motion score (from 25.7 +/- 2.1 to 28.3 +/- 1.9, p = 0.196) or segments with abnormal perfusion (7.6 +/- 1.1 to 7.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.916) and a trend towards a greater number of ischemic segments (from 4.5 +/- 0.6 to 6.1 +/- 1.0, p = 0.068). There was no improvement in exercise duration at 1 month (p = 0.37) or at 3 months (p = 0.98) versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS:Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration to CAD patients mobilizes cells with endothelial progenitor potential from bone marrow, but without objective evidence of cardiac benefit and with the potential for adverse outcomes in some patients.
Authors: A H Yin; S Miraglia; E D Zanjani; G Almeida-Porada; M Ogawa; A G Leary; J Olweus; J Kearney; D W Buck Journal: Blood Date: 1997-12-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: M Peichev; A J Naiyer; D Pereira; Z Zhu; W J Lane; M Williams; M C Oz; D J Hicklin; L Witte; M A Moore; S Rafii Journal: Blood Date: 2000-02-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: U M Gehling; S Ergün; U Schumacher; C Wagener; K Pantel; M Otte; G Schuch; P Schafhausen; T Mende; N Kilic; K Kluge; B Schäfer; D K Hossfeld; W Fiedler Journal: Blood Date: 2000-05-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tiffany M Powell; Jonathan D Paul; Jonathan M Hill; Michael Thompson; Moshe Benjamin; Maria Rodrigo; J Philip McCoy; Elizabeth J Read; Hanh M Khuu; Susan F Leitman; Toren Finkel; Richard O Cannon Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: T Takahashi; C Kalka; H Masuda; D Chen; M Silver; M Kearney; M Magner; J M Isner; T Asahara Journal: Nat Med Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Benjamin Hibbert; Bradley Hayley; Robert S Beanlands; Michel Le May; Richard Davies; Derek So; Jean-François Marquis; Marino Labinaz; Michael Froeschl; Edward R O'Brien; Ian G Burwash; George A Wells; Ali Pourdjabbar; Trevor Simard; Harold Atkins; Christopher Glover Journal: CMAJ Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 8.262