OBJECTIVE: In this study, we tested 3 techniques of atrial septal defect closure under real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance in a swine model. METHODS: The operations were conducted under the sole guidance of a modified real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance system with a x4 matrix transducer (Sonos 7500, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Mass). Eighteen swine were anesthetized, and after median sternotomy, the echo probe was applied directly to the surface of the right atrium. To create an atrial septal defect, balloon atrial septostomy and atrial septal defect enlargement were performed. Subsequently, 3 different techniques of atrial septal defect closure were attempted: group I, direct suture closure; group II, closure of the atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer device (AGA Medical Corp, Golden Valley, Minn); and group III, patch closure of the atrial septal defect (n = 6 each). RESULTS: Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance provided sufficient spatial resolution and a satisfactory frame rate to provide a "virtual surgeon's view" of the relevant anatomy during the entire procedure. All atrial septal defects were enlarged, and the mean final size was 8.5 +/- 1.8 mm. Atrial septal defect closure was successfully accomplished with all the 3 surgical techniques examined. In groups I and III, the needles (1-3 sutures) and staples (6-12 staples) penetrated the tissue and patch material consistently, whereas in group III, the Amplatzer atrial septal defect device was easily deployed. There was no incident device/staple embolization or air introduction. Neither intraoperative 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography nor postmortem macro-evaluation revealed any residual shunts. CONCLUSIONS: Beating heart atrial septal defect closure under real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic guidance is feasible and, unlike catheter-based devices, applicable for any type of secundum atrial septal defect.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we tested 3 techniques of atrial septal defect closure under real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance in a swine model. METHODS: The operations were conducted under the sole guidance of a modified real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance system with a x4 matrix transducer (Sonos 7500, Philips Medical Systems, Andover, Mass). Eighteen swine were anesthetized, and after median sternotomy, the echo probe was applied directly to the surface of the right atrium. To create an atrial septal defect, balloon atrial septostomy and atrial septal defect enlargement were performed. Subsequently, 3 different techniques of atrial septal defect closure were attempted: group I, direct suture closure; group II, closure of the atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer device (AGA Medical Corp, Golden Valley, Minn); and group III, patch closure of the atrial septal defect (n = 6 each). RESULTS: Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography guidance provided sufficient spatial resolution and a satisfactory frame rate to provide a "virtual surgeon's view" of the relevant anatomy during the entire procedure. All atrial septal defects were enlarged, and the mean final size was 8.5 +/- 1.8 mm. Atrial septal defect closure was successfully accomplished with all the 3 surgical techniques examined. In groups I and III, the needles (1-3 sutures) and staples (6-12 staples) penetrated the tissue and patch material consistently, whereas in group III, the Amplatzer atrial septal defect device was easily deployed. There was no incident device/staple embolization or air introduction. Neither intraoperative 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography nor postmortem macro-evaluation revealed any residual shunts. CONCLUSIONS: Beating heart atrial septal defect closure under real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic guidance is feasible and, unlike catheter-based devices, applicable for any type of secundum atrial septal defect.
Authors: Marius George Linguraru; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Pedro J Del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2007-05-22 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Cristian A Linte; John Moore; Chris Wedlake; Daniel Bainbridge; Gérard M Guiraudon; Douglas L Jones; Terry M Peters Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Shelten G Yuen; Daniel T Kettler; Paul M Novotny; Richard D Plowes; Robert D Howe Journal: Int J Rob Res Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 4.703
Authors: Eric L Sarin; Weiwei Shi; Rajnish Duara; Todd A Melone; Kanika Kalra; Ashley Strong; Apoorva Girish; Bryant V McIver; Vinod H Thourani; Robert A Guyton; Muralidhar Padala Journal: Comp Med Date: 2016 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Asghar Ataollahi; Ignacio Berra; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Zurab Machaidze; Pierre E Dupont Journal: IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 5.303
Authors: Marius George Linguraru; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Gerald R Marx; Wayne Tworetzky; Pedro J Del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Marius George Linguraru; Alexandre Kabla; Gerald R Marx; Pedro J del Nido; Robert D Howe Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.173