Jill Reedy1, Pamela S Haines, Marci Kramish Campbell. 1. National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd, MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA. reedyj@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People who choose to take dietary supplements are often classified as having a healthful lifestyle; however, it is probable that several health behavior patterns exist among users. OBJECTIVE: Data from the North Carolina Strategies to Improve Diet, Exercise, and Screening study (N = 727) were used to identify and describe five different categories of dietary supplement use and evaluate how these categories are associated with both quantity and quality of fruit and vegetable consumption. DESIGN: Five nonoverlapping dietary supplement use categories were created and descriptive demographic statistics were compared. Least-squares means were calculated for knowledge and fruit and vegetable quality and quantity measures. Logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios to examine associations among the dietary supplement use categories and the fruit and vegetable measures, using nonusers as the reference category. RESULTS: Demographic profiles and dietary intake varied among the dietary supplement categories. People reporting both a multivitamin/multimineral and a single supplement (Multi Plus category) and any nonvitamin/nonmineral products (Herbals category) were more likely to be consuming more vegetables and higher-quality fruits and vegetables than those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers category), whereas people taking multivitamins/multiminerals only (Multis category) had patterns that were more consistently similar to those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers). CONCLUSIONS: Study participants exhibited dietary supplement use patterns that were associated with differences in fruit and vegetable consumption. Simply characterizing people as users and nonusers will not capture critical demographic and dietary differences and will likely further cloud investigations of diet-disease relationships.
BACKGROUND:People who choose to take dietary supplements are often classified as having a healthful lifestyle; however, it is probable that several health behavior patterns exist among users. OBJECTIVE: Data from the North Carolina Strategies to Improve Diet, Exercise, and Screening study (N = 727) were used to identify and describe five different categories of dietary supplement use and evaluate how these categories are associated with both quantity and quality of fruit and vegetable consumption. DESIGN: Five nonoverlapping dietary supplement use categories were created and descriptive demographic statistics were compared. Least-squares means were calculated for knowledge and fruit and vegetable quality and quantity measures. Logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios to examine associations among the dietary supplement use categories and the fruit and vegetable measures, using nonusers as the reference category. RESULTS: Demographic profiles and dietary intake varied among the dietary supplement categories. People reporting both a multivitamin/multimineral and a single supplement (Multi Plus category) and any nonvitamin/nonmineral products (Herbals category) were more likely to be consuming more vegetables and higher-quality fruits and vegetables than those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers category), whereas people taking multivitamins/multiminerals only (Multis category) had patterns that were more consistently similar to those not taking any dietary supplements (Nonusers). CONCLUSIONS: Study participants exhibited dietary supplement use patterns that were associated with differences in fruit and vegetable consumption. Simply characterizing people as users and nonusers will not capture critical demographic and dietary differences and will likely further cloud investigations of diet-disease relationships.
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Paige E Miller; Diane C Mitchell; Terryl J Hartman; Frank R Lawrence; Christopher T Sempos; Helen Smiciklas-Wright Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Susanne Rautiainen; J Michael Gaziano; William G Christen; Vadim Bubes; Gregory Kotler; Robert J Glynn; JoAnn E Manson; Julie E Buring; Howard D Sesso Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: H J Denison; K A Jameson; H E Syddall; E M Dennison; C Cooper; A Aihie Sayer; S M Robinson Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Katarzyna Iłowiecka; Monika Maślej; Magdalena Czajka; Adrian Pawłowski; Piotr Więckowski; Tomasz Styk; Michał Gołkiewicz; Adam Kuzdraliński; Wojciech Koch Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-06-01