Literature DB >> 16255630

Evolution of prenatal genetics: from point mutation testing to chromosomal microarray analysis.

Benjamin B Roa1, Joseph Pulliam, Christine M Eng, Sau Wai Cheung.   

Abstract

Molecular genetic testing involves DNA analysis using various methods for the purpose of diagnosing genetic disorders. In the prenatal DNA diagnostic setting, fetal DNA is usually tested for a specific single-gene disorder for which the fetal risk is 25% or more. In contrast, cytogenetic testing is often used to detect fetal chromosomal abnormalities in cases that involve a wider range of indications. Classic cytogenetic and DNA-based testing methods provide a range of aberrations detected with different levels of genomic resolution. More recently developed molecular cytogenetic methods provide powerful tools to bridge the technical divide between these related areas. One such hybrid method is microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Chromosomal microarray analysis has been applied to clinical testing for unbalanced gains or losses of genomic regions associated with genetic disorders. This technology is poised to have a substantial impact on clinical genetics, including prenatal genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16255630     DOI: 10.1586/14737159.5.6.883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  6 in total

1.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver; Ankita Patel; Chad A Shaw; Amber N Pursley; Sung-Hae L Kang; Marcia J Simovich; Patricia A Ward; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Sarah E Neill; Weimin Bi; Lisa D White; Christine M Eng; James R Lupski; Sau Wai Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Chromosome 15q13 microduplication in a fetus with cardiac rhabdomyoma: a case report.

Authors:  Chen-Zhao Lin; Bi-Ru Qi; Jian-Su Hu; Yu-Dian Huang; Xiu-Qiong Huang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Genome-wide copy number profiling on high-density bacterial artificial chromosomes, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and oligonucleotide microarrays: a platform comparison based on statistical power analysis.

Authors:  Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa; Michael Egmont-Petersen; Irene M Janssen; Dominique Smeets; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Mosaicism for r(X) and der(X)del(X)(p11.23)dup(X)(p11.21p11.22) provides insight into the possible mechanism of rearrangement.

Authors:  Oleg A Shchelochkov; M Lance Cooper; Zhishuo Ou; Sandra Peacock; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Chester W Brown; Ping Fang; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sau Wai Cheung
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.