Literature DB >> 16253911

Extent of myocardial viability predicts response to biventricular pacing in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

James P Hummel1, Jonathan R Lindner, J Todd Belcik, John D Ferguson, J Michael Mangrum, James D Bergin, David E Haines, Douglas E Lake, John P DiMarco, J Paul Mounsey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical response to biventricular pacing is unpredictable, especially in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the relationship between the extent of myocardial viability and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 21 +/- 5%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV, and QRS >120 ms received biventricular devices. Myocardial viability was assessed by myocardial contrast echocardiography, and a perfusion score index (PSI) was calculated from summed segmental perfusion scores. LV performance was assessed by echocardiography on the day after implantation and at 6 months.
RESULTS: PSI was closely correlated with acute improvement in LVEF (P = .003, r = 0.65), stroke volume (P = .02, r = 0.54), and end-systolic volume (P = .05, r = -0.49). PSI also correlated with early diastolic LV relaxation (E', P < .05, r = 0.50) and global myocardial performance or Tei index (P = .003, r = 0.63). By multiple linear regression analysis, PSI provided incremental predictive value to the degree of dyssynchrony, measured by tissue Doppler imaging, for predicting improvement in LVEF. At 6 months, PSI remained positively correlated with improvement in ventricular performance and with reduction in LV end-diastolic dimension (P = .003, r = -0.68). PSI also influenced the clinical variables of NYHA class, 6-minute walk distance, quality-of-life score, and number of hospitalizations for heart failure.
CONCLUSION: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, the extent of myocardial viability predicts acute and long-term improvement in LV performance, exercise tolerance, and reduction in LV end-diastolic dimension with biventricular pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16253911     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  20 in total

Review 1.  Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Dan Blendea; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Is speckle tracking actually helpful for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Hidekazu Tanaka; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 3.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Optimal use of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Gabe B Bleeker; Cheuk-Man Yu; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Johan de Sutter; Nico Van de Veire; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  [Cardiac resynchronization therapy: preoperative screening. How can we reliably predict response to CRT?].

Authors:  M Kindermann; F Mahfoud; C Ukena; G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-09

6.  Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Cavallino; Elisa Rondano; Andrea Magnani; Lucia Leva; Eugenio Inglese; Gabriele Dell'era; Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo N Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Recent advances in cardiac resynchronization therapy: echocardiographic modalities, patient selection, optimization, non-responders--all you need to know for more efficient CRT.

Authors:  Harry Pavlopoulos; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Presence of left ventricular contractile reserve, evaluated by means of dobutamine stress-echo test, is able to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Bernardino Tuccillo; Carmine Muto; Raffaele Iengo; Maria Accadia; Salvatore Rumolo; Micheleangelo Canciello; Giovanni Carreras; Raimondo Calvanese; Eduardo Celentano; Mario Davinelli; Sergio Valsecchi; Luigi Ascione
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: application of imaging to optimize patient selection and assess response.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick; Albert C Lardo
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-09

10.  Impact of contractile reserve on acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marie Moonen; Mario Senechal; Bernard Cosyns; Pierre Melon; Eric Nellessen; Luc Pierard; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.