Literature DB >> 16252098

Renal transplant biopsy specimen adequacy in a paediatric population.

Anne M Durkan1, T James Beattie, Allan Howatson, John H McColl, Ian J Ramage.   

Abstract

Updated guidelines on the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection including criteria for biopsy specimen adequacy were published in 1999. We sought to determine the adequacy of specimens in paediatric transplant patients and identify factors influencing adequacy. All renal transplant biopsies performed between 1998 and 2003 were classified as adequate (n =25), minimal (n =19) or inadequate (n =27) in accordance with the Banff 97 criteria, and the histological diagnoses were documented. The effect on specimen adequacy of grade of operator, method of sedation, age of child, needle gauge, number of cores and total core length was then investigated. Overall, a minimal or adequate specimen was obtained in 62% of cases. No histological diagnosis could be made in 30% of all specimens, just over half of which were inadequate. Higher rates of rejection were found in adequate (52%) than inadequate (33%) samples. The grade of operator (p =0.498), the age of the child at the time of biopsy (p =0.815) and type of sedation (p =0.188) did not affect adequacy. More than one core was obtained in 38 (54%) cases, and this was significantly associated with specimen adequacy (p <0.0005) as was longer total core length (p =0.002). Clinical features in isolation are not sufficient for the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection. Renal biopsy remains the gold standard and relies on adequate specimen collection. Our data shows that specimen adequacy according to the Banff 97 guidelines is achievable in children and that more than one core at the time of sampling significantly improves this achievement. Adequate sampling reduces the risk of an inconclusive histological diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16252098     DOI: 10.1007/s00467-005-2076-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol        ISSN: 0931-041X            Impact factor:   3.714


  21 in total

1.  The new Banff classification of renal transplant biopsies: a major impact on the adequacy of the cores taken.

Authors:  I Quiroga; G Morris-Stiff; R Baboo; D Griffiths; K Baboola; R Moore; C Darby; R Lord; A W Jurewicz
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Is there any correlation between pathologic changes for acute rejection in kidney transplantation (Banff 97) and graft function?

Authors:  R Palomar; J C Ruiz; J A Zubimendi; J G Cotorruelo; E Hernández; E Rodrigo; J F Val Bernal; M Arias
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Standards for renal biopsies: comparison of inpatient and day care procedures.

Authors:  Farida Hussain; Alan R Watson; Judith Hayes; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Renal transplant biopsy using real time ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  M L Nicholson; A R Attard; A Bell; P K Donnelly; P S Veitch; P R Bell
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-06

5.  Acute renal allograft rejection with intimal arteritis: histologic predictors of response to therapy and graft survival.

Authors:  Mark Haas; Edward S Kraus; Milagros Samaniego-Picota; Lorraine C Racusen; Wen Ni; Joseph A Eustace
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology.

Authors:  K Solez; R A Axelsen; H Benediktsson; J F Burdick; A H Cohen; R B Colvin; B P Croker; D Droz; M S Dunnill; P F Halloran
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Automatic spring-loaded biopsy gun with ultrasonic control for renal transplant biopsy.

Authors:  M W McDonald; J T Sosnowski; E J Mahin; D A Willard; D L Lamm
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: report of the CERTPAP Project.

Authors:  P N Furness; N Taub
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Evolution and pathophysiology of renal-transplant glomerulosclerosis.

Authors:  Brian J Nankivell; Richard J Borrows; Caroline L S Fung; Philip J O'Connell; Richard D M Allen; Jeremy R Chapman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Lorraine C Racusen; Robert B Colvin; Kim Solez; Michael J Mihatsch; Philip F Halloran; Patricia M Campbell; Michael J Cecka; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; Anthony J Demetris; Michael C Fishbein; Agnes Fogo; Peter Furness; Ian W Gibson; Denis Glotz; Pekka Hayry; Lawrence Hunsickern; Michael Kashgarian; Ronald Kerman; Alex J Magil; Robert Montgomery; Kunio Morozumi; Volker Nickeleit; Parmjeet Randhawa; Heinz Regele; Daniel Seron; Surya Seshan; Stale Sund; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric renal transplant biopsy with ultrasound guidance: the 'core' essentials.

Authors:  Aris Oates; Saveen Ahuja; Marsha M Lee; Andrew S Phelps; John D Mackenzie; Jesse L Courtier
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  Percutaneous native renal biopsy adequacy: a successful interdepartmental quality improvement activity.

Authors:  Laurette Geldenhuys; Peter Nicholson; Namita Sinha; Angela Dini; Steve Doucette; Talal Alfaadhel; Valerie Keough; Michael West
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2015-03-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.