Literature DB >> 11918760

Acute renal allograft rejection with intimal arteritis: histologic predictors of response to therapy and graft survival.

Mark Haas1, Edward S Kraus, Milagros Samaniego-Picota, Lorraine C Racusen, Wen Ni, Joseph A Eustace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection with intimal arteritis is designated by the widely used Banff 97 classification as type 2A or 2B depending on the extent of arteritis, without regard to interstitial inflammation or tubulitis. We examined whether the distinction between type 2A and 2B is relevant to short- and long-term clinical outcomes, and if outcomes in this subset of acute rejection also are affected by tubulitis, interstitial inflammation, and several additional histologic and clinical parameters.
METHODS: Pathology records were searched to identify cases of acute renal allograft rejection with intimal arteritis diagnosed between January 1985 and September 2000. For each case, the patient's chart was reviewed to determine the response of the rejection episode to therapy, type(s) of therapy given, and length of graft survival. All biopsies were reviewed and Banff acute and chronic indices recorded by a pathologist blinded to these data. Biopsies not showing type 2A or 2B rejection were excluded, as were repeat biopsies from the same patient and cases with recurrent glomerular disease, viral infection, donor-specific antibodies, or more than mild chronic change.
RESULTS: The initial response to anti-rejection therapy was significantly worse in patients with type 2B acute rejection (N = 29) than in those with type 2A (N = 102) by univariate and multivariate analyses, despite more aggressive treatment of type 2B rejection. In a Cox proportional hazards model the hazard ratio for graft failure for 2B versus 2A was 1.9 (P = 0.05), but this was not significant when adjusted for the initial response to therapy. Cases with minimal or mild tubulitis responded better to therapy than those with moderate or severe tubulitis, although graft survival was not significantly affected by the tubulitis score.
CONCLUSIONS: The distinction between types 2A and 2B acute rejection in the Banff 97 classification has significant prognostic value with regard to both short- and long-term clinical outcomes, although the difference in long-term graft survival is mainly related to the initial response to therapy. Reports of biopsies showing type 2A or 2B rejection also should specify the degree of tubulitis present, as the latter may significantly influence the initial response to therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918760     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00254.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  8 in total

1.  A molecular classifier for predicting future graft loss in late kidney transplant biopsies.

Authors:  Gunilla Einecke; Jeff Reeve; Banu Sis; Michael Mengel; Luis Hidalgo; Konrad S Famulski; Arthur Matas; Bert Kasiske; Bruce Kaplan; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Histopathological diagnosis of acute and chronic rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Verena Bröcker; Michael Mengel
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Blocking MHC class II on human endothelium mitigates acute rejection.

Authors:  Parwiz Abrahimi; Lingfeng Qin; William G Chang; Alfred L M Bothwell; George Tellides; W Mark Saltzman; Jordan S Pober
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  Reassessing the Significance of Intimal Arteritis in Kidney Transplant Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Israel D R Salazar; Maribel Merino López; Jessica Chang; Philip F Halloran
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Renal transplant biopsy specimen adequacy in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Anne M Durkan; T James Beattie; Allan Howatson; John H McColl; Ian J Ramage
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 6.  Efficacy of Acute Cellular Rejection Treatment According to Banff Score in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caroline Lamarche; Jean-Maxime Côté; Lynne Sénécal; Héloïse Cardinal
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-11-15

7.  The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  A Loupy; M Haas; K Solez; L Racusen; D Glotz; D Seron; B J Nankivell; R B Colvin; M Afrouzian; E Akalin; N Alachkar; S Bagnasco; J U Becker; L Cornell; C Drachenberg; D Dragun; H de Kort; I W Gibson; E S Kraus; C Lefaucheur; C Legendre; H Liapis; T Muthukumar; V Nickeleit; B Orandi; W Park; M Rabant; P Randhawa; E F Reed; C Roufosse; S V Seshan; B Sis; H K Singh; C Schinstock; A Tambur; A Zeevi; M Mengel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 8.  BK Polyomavirus Virus Glomerular Tropism: Implications for Virus Reactivation from Latency and Amplification during Immunosuppression.

Authors:  Donald J Alcendor
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.