PURPOSE: The interaction between mivacurium and inhaled anesthetics is known, with the exception of xenon. We compared the pharmacodynamics of mivacurium during xenon anesthesia vs total iv anesthesia with propofol. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was carried out in the Aachen University Hospital. Forty-two adult patients ASA I or II, aged 18 to 60 yr, were randomized to receive either xenon or propofol anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil in both groups (each n = 21). The xenon group received xenon via face mask until an end-expiratory concentration of 60% was reached for one minute. Meanwhile, the acceleromyograph was calibrated and a train-of-four stimulation of the adductor pollicis muscle was started. After stabilization of the signal for five minutes, a single bolus of 0.16 mg.kg-1 mivacurium was injected. Anesthesia was maintained with xenon and remifentanil or with propofol and remifentanil. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to onset time (xenon 180 +/- 64 vs propofol 195 +/- 77 sec; P = 0.39), duration (xenon 16.18 +/- 4.97 vs propofol 15.68 +/- 6.17 min; P = 0.73), recovery index (xenon 5.63 +/- 2.48 vs propofol 5.73 +/- 2.12 min; P = 0.42) and clinical recovery (xenon 8.75 +/- 2.57 vs propofol 9.28 +/- 2.28 min; P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effects of mivacurium are similar when given during propofol vs xenon anesthesia.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The interaction between mivacurium and inhaled anesthetics is known, with the exception of xenon. We compared the pharmacodynamics of mivacurium during xenon anesthesia vs total iv anesthesia with propofol. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was carried out in the Aachen University Hospital. Forty-two adult patientsASA I or II, aged 18 to 60 yr, were randomized to receive either xenon or propofol anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil in both groups (each n = 21). The xenon group received xenon via face mask until an end-expiratory concentration of 60% was reached for one minute. Meanwhile, the acceleromyograph was calibrated and a train-of-four stimulation of the adductor pollicis muscle was started. After stabilization of the signal for five minutes, a single bolus of 0.16 mg.kg-1 mivacurium was injected. Anesthesia was maintained with xenon and remifentanil or with propofol and remifentanil. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to onset time (xenon 180 +/- 64 vs propofol 195 +/- 77 sec; P = 0.39), duration (xenon 16.18 +/- 4.97 vs propofol 15.68 +/- 6.17 min; P = 0.73), recovery index (xenon 5.63 +/- 2.48 vs propofol 5.73 +/- 2.12 min; P = 0.42) and clinical recovery (xenon 8.75 +/- 2.57 vs propofol 9.28 +/- 2.28 min; P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effects of mivacurium are similar when given during propofol vs xenon anesthesia.