RATIONALE: Nicotine has two effects on reinforcement in traditional self-administration paradigms. It serves as a primary reinforcer by increasing the probability of behaviors that result in nicotine delivery. However, nicotine also potently enhances behaviors that result in the delivery of nonpharmacological reinforcers. OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to dissociate these two effects of nicotine on reinforcement. METHODS: For one group of rats (2 lever), a nonpharmacological reinforcer [visual stimulus (VS)] was available for pressing one lever. Nicotine infusions were available for pressing a different lever. A second group (NIC + VS) received more traditional self-administration training; both the VS and nicotine were delivered for pressing a single active lever. Control groups received either nicotine infusions (NIC only) or VS presentations (VS only) for pressing the active lever. RESULTS: Nicotine alone was a weak reinforcer; the VS alone was slightly more reinforcing than nicotine. When these two reinforcers were combined (NIC + VS), response rates were synergistically increased. For the 2-lever group, responding on the nicotine lever was weak, matching the response rates of rats receiving nicotine alone. However, responding on the VS lever was potently enhanced in this group; equaling the response rates for rats receiving both reinforcers for making a single response (NIC + VS). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine are very potent even when only moderate quantities of the drug are self-administered. Moreover, they provide the first demonstration that the reinforcement-enhancing and primary reinforcing effects of nicotine can be dissociated behaviorally.
RATIONALE: Nicotine has two effects on reinforcement in traditional self-administration paradigms. It serves as a primary reinforcer by increasing the probability of behaviors that result in nicotine delivery. However, nicotine also potently enhances behaviors that result in the delivery of nonpharmacological reinforcers. OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to dissociate these two effects of nicotine on reinforcement. METHODS: For one group of rats (2 lever), a nonpharmacological reinforcer [visual stimulus (VS)] was available for pressing one lever. Nicotine infusions were available for pressing a different lever. A second group (NIC + VS) received more traditional self-administration training; both the VS and nicotine were delivered for pressing a single active lever. Control groups received either nicotine infusions (NIC only) or VS presentations (VS only) for pressing the active lever. RESULTS:Nicotine alone was a weak reinforcer; the VS alone was slightly more reinforcing than nicotine. When these two reinforcers were combined (NIC + VS), response rates were synergistically increased. For the 2-lever group, responding on the nicotine lever was weak, matching the response rates of rats receiving nicotine alone. However, responding on the VS lever was potently enhanced in this group; equaling the response rates for rats receiving both reinforcers for making a single response (NIC + VS). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine are very potent even when only moderate quantities of the drug are self-administered. Moreover, they provide the first demonstration that the reinforcement-enhancing and primary reinforcing effects of nicotine can be dissociated behaviorally.
Authors: Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Sheri Booth; Maysa A Gharib; Laure A Craven; Shannon S Allen; Alan F Sved; Kenneth A Perkins Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-01-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Thomas J Hopkins; Laura E Rupprecht; Matthew R Hayes; Julie A Blendy; Heath D Schmidt Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Matthew T Weaver; Maggie Sweitzer; Sarah Coddington; Jaimee Sheppard; Nicole Verdecchia; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Gina L Matteson; Eric C Donny; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-08-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Nadia Chaudhri; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Alan F Sved Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-10-21 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Gina L Matteson; Jessica J Black; Xiu Liu; Anthony R Caggiula; Laure Craven; Eric C Donny; Alan F Sved Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Anthony R Caggiula; Eric C Donny; Alan F Sved Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-11-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Matthew I Palmatier; Kimberley R Marks; Scott A Jones; Kyle S Freeman; Kevin M Wissman; A Brianna Sheppard Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 4.530