BACKGROUND: The deceased donor score (DDS), expanded criteria donor (ECD) definition, and resistive index (RI) were developed for pretransplant evaluation of donors. DDS and ECD are determined by a calculation of risk from donor variables, while RI is determined from flow characteristics of kidneys during machine preservation (MP). This study was designed to compare DDS, ECD status, and RI as predictors of outcome after deceased donor transplantation. We were also interested to see if DDS or ECD could identify kidneys most likely to benefit from MP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48,952 deceased donor renal transplants reported to UNOS from 1997-2002. DDS (0-39 pts.), ECD status (+ or -), and preservation technique (MP vs. cold storage [CS]) were determined in all cases. RI during MP was studied in a single-center cohort of 425 transplants. RESULTS: DDS was superior to ECD status and RI in its correlation with early and late renal function after transplantation. DDS identified a subgroup of ECD- kidneys, those with DDS > or = 20 pts, that functioned significantly below expectation and similar to ECD+ kidneys. Benefits of MP, which include improved early graft function and a trend towards longer graft survival, were greatest in the group of kidneys with DDS > or = 20 pts. CONCLUSIONS: DDS was the best predictor of outcome after deceased donor renal transplantation and may be useful in identifying kidneys most likely to benefit from MP.
BACKGROUND: The deceased donor score (DDS), expanded criteria donor (ECD) definition, and resistive index (RI) were developed for pretransplant evaluation of donors. DDS and ECD are determined by a calculation of risk from donor variables, while RI is determined from flow characteristics of kidneys during machine preservation (MP). This study was designed to compare DDS, ECD status, and RI as predictors of outcome after deceased donor transplantation. We were also interested to see if DDS or ECD could identify kidneys most likely to benefit from MP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48,952 deceased donor renal transplants reported to UNOS from 1997-2002. DDS (0-39 pts.), ECD status (+ or -), and preservation technique (MP vs. cold storage [CS]) were determined in all cases. RI during MP was studied in a single-center cohort of 425 transplants. RESULTS:DDS was superior to ECD status and RI in its correlation with early and late renal function after transplantation. DDS identified a subgroup of ECD- kidneys, those with DDS > or = 20 pts, that functioned significantly below expectation and similar to ECD+ kidneys. Benefits of MP, which include improved early graft function and a trend towards longer graft survival, were greatest in the group of kidneys with DDS > or = 20 pts. CONCLUSIONS:DDS was the best predictor of outcome after deceased donor renal transplantation and may be useful in identifying kidneys most likely to benefit from MP.
Authors: Javier Barba; Juan Javier Zudaire; José Enrique Robles; David Rosell; José María Berian; Ignacio Pascual Journal: World J Urol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Midas Seyda; Markus Quante; Hirofumi Uehara; Bendix R Slegtenhorst; Abdala Elkhal; Stefan G Tullius Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: María José Pérez-Sáez; Núria Montero; Dolores Redondo-Pachón; Marta Crespo; Julio Pascual Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mariano J Scian; Daniel G Maluf; Kellie J Archer; Stephen D Turner; Jihee L Suh; Krystle G David; Anne L King; Marc P Posner; Kenneth L Brayman; Valeria R Mas Journal: Transplantation Date: 2012-10-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ramesh Saxena; Xueqing Yu; Mauricio Giraldo; Juan Arenas; Miguel Vazquez; Christopher Y Lu; Nosratola D Vaziri; Fred G Silva; Xin J Zhou Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Volker Unger; Christian Grosse-Siestrup; Claudia Fehrenberg; Axel Fischer; Michael Meissler; David A Groneberg Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 2.646