Literature DB >> 16248742

Semantic and phonological context effects in speech error repair.

Robert J Hartsuiker1, Martin J Pickering, Nivja H de Jong.   

Abstract

When speakers repair speech errors, they plan the repair in the context of an abandoned word (the error) that is usually similar in meaning or form. Two picture-naming experiments tested whether the error's lexical representations influence repair planning. Context pictures were sometimes replaced with target pictures; the picture names were related in meaning or form or were unrelated. The authors measured target picture-naming latencies separately for trials in which the context name was interrupted or completed. Interrupted trials showed semantic interference and phonological facilitation, whereas completed trials showed semantic facilitation and phonological interference. Thus, errors influence repair production. The authors explain the polarity of these effects in terms of the literature on context effects in word production.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248742     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

3.  A rose by any other name is still a rose: A reinterpretation of Hantsch and Mädebach.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-28

4.  The timing of spontaneous detection and repair of naming errors in aphasia.

Authors:  Julia Schuchard; Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Cognitive control during selection and repair in word production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Michael Freund; Bonnie Breining; Brenda Rapp; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Form Overrides Meaning When Bilinguals Monitor for Errors.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Victor S Ferreira; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Are phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection the result of a monitoring bias?

Authors:  Els Severens; Elie Ratinckx; Victor S Ferreira; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Lexical Retrieval is not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Paul Del Prato; Francesca Peressotti; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  STOP TALKING! Inhibition of Speech is Affected by Word Frequency and Dysfunctional Impulsivity.

Authors:  Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Ingrid K Christoffels
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.