Literature DB >> 16248569

Multidimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry for the identification and prioritization of malodors from confined animal feeding operations.

Donald W Wright1, David K Eaton, Lawrence T Nielsen, Fred W Kuhrt, Jacek A Koziel, Jarett P Spinhirne, David B Parker.   

Abstract

Odor profiling efforts were directed at applying to high-density livestock operations some of the lessons learned in resolving past, highly diverse, odor-focused investigations in the consumer product industry. Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was used for field air sampling of odorous air near and downwind of a beef cattle feedyard and a swine finisher barn in Texas. Multidimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry (MDGC-O) was utilized in an attempt to define and prioritize the basic building blocks of odor character associated with these livestock operations. Although scores of potential odorant volatiles have been previously identified in high-density livestock operations, the odor profile results developed herein suggest that only a very few of these may constitute the preponderance of the odor complaints associated with these environments. This appeared to be especially true for the case of increasing distance from both cattle feedyard and swine barn facilities, with p-cresol consistently taking on the dominant odor impact role with ever increasing distance. In contrast, at- or near-site odor profiles were shown to be much more complex, with many of the well-known lower tier odorant compounds rising in relative significance. For the cattle feedyard at- or near-site odor profiles, trimethylamine was shown to represent a significantly greater individual odor impact relative to the more often cited livestock odorants such as hydrogen sulfide, the organic sulfides, and volatile fatty acids. This study demonstrates that SPME combined with a MDGC-O-mass spectrometry system can be used for the sampling, identification, and prioritization of odors associated with livestock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16248569     DOI: 10.1021/jf050763b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  10 in total

1.  Odor Control in the Cannabis Industry: Lessons from the New Kid on the Block.

Authors:  Nate Seltenrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.035

2.  "Skunky" Cannabis: Environmental Odor Troubleshooting and the "Need-for-Speed".

Authors:  Jacek A Koziel; Alex Guenther; William Vizuete; Donald W Wright; Anna Iwasinska
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Perceived annoyance from environmental odors and association with atmospheric ammonia levels in non-urban residential communities: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Victoria Blanes-Vidal; Esmaeil S Nadimi; Thomas Ellermann; Helle V Andersen; Per Løfstrøm
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Recovery of agricultural odors and odorous compounds from polyvinyl fluoride film bags.

Authors:  David B Parker; Zena L Perschbacher-Buser; N Andy Cole; Jacek A Koziel
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Gas chromatography analysis with olfactometric detection (GC-O) as a useful methodology for chemical characterization of odorous compounds.

Authors:  Magda Brattoli; Ezia Cisternino; Paolo Rosario Dambruoso; Gianluigi de Gennaro; Pasquale Giungato; Antonio Mazzone; Jolanda Palmisani; Maria Tutino
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Analytical methods for chemical and sensory characterization of scent-markings in large wild mammals: a review.

Authors:  Simone B Soso; Jacek A Koziel; Anna Johnson; Young Jin Lee; W Sue Fairbanks
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Effects of Dilution Systems in Olfactometry on the Recovery of Typical Livestock Odorants Determined by PTR-MS.

Authors:  Pernille Lund Kasper; Dietmar Mannebeck; Arne Oxbøl; Jens Vinge Nygaard; Michael Jørgen Hansen; Anders Feilberg
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Sorptive process and breakthrough behavior of odorous volatile compounds on inert surfaces.

Authors:  Ezaz Ahmed; Jan E Szulejko; Adedeji A Adelodun; Satya Sundar Bhattacharya; Byong Hun Jeon; Sandeep Kumar; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Performance comparison of MOF and other sorbent materials in removing key odorants emitted from pigpen slurry.

Authors:  Ezaz Ahmed; Akash Deep; Eilhann E Kwon; Richard J C Brown; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Qualitative Exploration of the 'Rolling Unmasking Effect' for Downwind Odor Dispersion from a Model Animal Source.

Authors:  Donald W Wright; Jacek A Koziel; David B Parker; Anna Iwasinska; Thomas G Hartman; Paula Kolvig; Landon Wahe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.